[-] defiant@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

The restrictions on commercial use means it does not meet the non-discrimination part of the open source definition.

This blog post from the OSI explains it well: https://blog.opensource.org/metas-llama-2-license-is-not-open-source/

[-] defiant@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Llama 2 is not open source. tech companies need to stop abusing the term.

[-] defiant@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

How many times can Elon shoot himself in the foot with Twitter before it dies

defiant

joined 1 year ago