34
we have finally achieved A Guy in India
This is why you should never allow the use of the marketing term "AI", and instead always refer to the specific technologies.
The use case for the term "AI" is to conflate things that work (ML) with things that don't work (LLMs).
we find they tend to post here, though not for long
must be woke mind virus, we don't even acknowledge race and iq, smdh
don't forget the ones outraged they can't use the Daily Mail or the Sun as sources
23
36
the Nostr guy totally isn't a nazi, how dare you! he's just an extremely interested reader of a nazi
(www.businessinsider.com)
FHI was basically funded by one guy, James Martin - a computer millionaire. (His Wikipedia article misses the source of his wealth, but he owned a private island and the Oxford Martin School donation was the largest single donation in Oxford University's history.) He died in 2013. Its days were numbered at that point. https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/about/founder/
or that the existing AI works. Some of the worst social damage is from AI systems deployed in the wild that don't even do their fucking job properly in the first place, let alone doing it evilly. (Many deployments are both evil and incompetent.)
Reminder that doing something extremely cool and good once doesn't make you immune to posting cringe
some of us are riding this bomb until it impacts, waving our hats and shouting YEE-HAW
it certainly is, my dude. it certainly is
They apparently copied without attribution in a manner that was a violation? I'm still looking for precise wording of the PEL.
It's very hard to violate the Apache license, but these are the sort of bozos who could manage it.
EDIT: Here is the PEL. It lacks the attribution requirements of section 4 of the Apache Licence 2.0. So yeah, they managed it.
This is a small technical violation that's easily remedied, but I understand that's what got people pissed off.