Not really. The more pictures that are available for a person, the fewer false positives there are, if you only have one face on photo that can be confidently linked to you, you would only ever be identified by that exact angle and feature set. It would be useless outside of applications that specifically request that (and even then it's really buggy, any Uber driver can attest to how shit facial recognition can be with limited info).
dontgooglefinderscult
joined 5 months ago
Liberals attempt to not fantasize about genocide: impossible edition.
The thing is the tea party was the same as the Republican party. Both were nationalist ultra capitalists that believed money should buy power. Democrats are the same, really.
Any left wing thought, is entirely different from either of the major parties. There's not really a way to pacify it.
We aren't lucky enough to have corporate masters that would allow that.
No, not really. That's the point. Kernel level anticheat has no real advantages and is easily bypassed. It's the laziest possible solution that only detects and blocks the laziest possible implementations of cheats.
Good game design eliminates the possibility of cheating. Cheats are only ever possible if you take enough stupid and lazy shortcuts that it's easy to take advantage.
It is amazing Muslims ever voted for Dems after 9/11 proved the entire democratic party leadership was just as bigoted as Republicans. Hopefully Dems go the way of the whig's and we can get some new parties.
They're legitimate orders. And more dead intelligence agents is a good thing for everyone. It's like a bull in a genocide shop. It's be terrible if the shop sold anything good, but luckily the damage it does is a net positive for the world.
Expanding the war on terror, causing the war in Ukraine, letting the bankers that made up his cabinet just wholesale write and pass regulations, crushing unions, funding and arming Mexican cartels... Obama was a terrible human being. He was a standard US president, representative of the empire, and responsible for the deaths of millions that were in the way of us interests.
This isnt redd*t. Being a neoliberal isn't a good thing here.
If you and Dems really believed that, Biden wouldn't allow a peaceful transfer of power.
Eco states in the same paper, if you ever care to read it, that fascism will not have all the features, but will have multiple.
In other words skip the first three and you have Harris.
Deregulation, unscientific claims, advocating for negative public health decisions, advocating for war, advocating for other countries propaganda. It's genuinely an easy thing to do.
If you advocate for, say, allowing private companies to operate essential services like medical care or water purification, you're arguing to harm the people. We know both of those are terrible things to have privatized, we have the US as an example.