I am quite disappointed at the lack of transparency regarding this.

this is from the google research team, they contribute a LOT to many foss projects. Google is not a monolith, each team is made of often very different folk, who have very different goals

Why People Arent Buying Sony Xperia Phones

because they are fucking expensive

this is quite frankly, a really dumb picture that is wrong on many accounts

well this took literal years longer then I thought it would.

this is a really dumb take lmao

uses the GNOME interface

yeah thats a no from me.

The reason why firefox and chrome work so well, is that they literally have been in development for over a decade. In Firefox's case, it's actually over two decades now.

Instead of trying to reinvent the wheel, why not support some currently existing alternative browsers that look promising? You have servo, you have webkit, and you even have a ladybird now. That's three potential browsers.

All three are under somewhat active development. Servo, in my opinion, looking the most promising, that shares a lot of dependencies with Firefox still, which means maintenance cost is not super high. It's easy to hack on, and of course it's rust. ~~who doesnt love rust~~

sounds like a lot of work when you could just install arch or nobara and be done with it

literally, all Chrome OS / chromium OS needs to do for me to actually embrace it. is native out of box flatpack support

one issue I might see them having with flatpack, is the permissions right now are handled kind of stupidly IMO. but if those get solved I think flatpack would be a great addition to chromium os ecosystem

that feeling when you can remeber what shade of orange emoji you used on your password

all chromeOS needs to be immensely more useful is flatpak support, if chrome OS supported flatpaks directly, it could very well be my goto (well not chromeOS directly, probably thoriumOS) for older linux PCs for general populace