dustyb0tt0mz

joined 2 months ago
[–] dustyb0tt0mz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] dustyb0tt0mz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

then stfu. you don't live here any more.

[–] dustyb0tt0mz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

coward bootlicker

[–] dustyb0tt0mz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

post your address, loser

[–] dustyb0tt0mz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] dustyb0tt0mz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

coward defeatists will lick the boot

[–] dustyb0tt0mz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

that's a complicated answer.

practical answer: yes

idealistic answer: no

EDIT: i think the most important answer for right now is that it doesn't matter. this situation will not be resolved through voting. the mid terms might help alleviate the problem, but that's a long time from now and things could get a lot worse if people don't pull their heads out of their asses now.

 

A look into how the tech leaders may be using the new administration to achieve their own agenda. Looking specifically at Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, Marc Andressen, Ben Horotwitz, Brian Armstrong, and David Sacks as well as their relationship with figures like JD Vance, Balaji Srinivasan, and Curtis Yarvin. There is a focused discussion on how a shaping of the government might take place based on convergences between the ideas of Yarvin, who influences the tech libertarian right, and Project 2025, who have authored a playbook exclusively for President Trump to help with his transition to power.

view more: next ›