If they make it more exact such that it's not ambiguous whether they can use our data for whatever, that would be fine.
fakeplastic
joined 1 month ago
So for the last 20 plus years before this new wording, Firefox has not been a functional browser?
What business is it of yours to make someone explain their software use? I don't touch Chrome, I primarily use Firefox, and I use Edge as a secondary browser. Is that acceptable?
A model randomly creating quirky output like hands with six fingers does not get you to David Lynch.
Yes, I demonstrated that technological progress allows us to live our lives memorizing fewer words since they can be looked up so easily. But I wrote a substantive and original argument. Did you? Will it be even harder for you after ten years of letting machines do your writing and thinking for you?
People don't do everyday fucking math at the grocery store like they should because they don't have the wherewithal to pull out the calculator for all the everyday things. People fucking can use a calculator to do math, but they choose not to unless they're forced to. So the math just doesn't get done. Now imagine what will happen a generation down the road when it's not math that people have given up practicing, but general fucking thinking.
It's a bug that was introduced in 0.27.4. If we're all seeing then it must be pretty common.
I don't think a middle aged group would capture the spirit of the original. But I also don't think there's any reason it can't work out any specific way, it comes down to execution.
There's zero reason to oppose this. There's many more bad movies than good movies. The loss of a potential good movie is worse than any harm that can be done by a bad movie, which happens all the time. No harm can come to the original unless we decide to think of it that way, we're adults and we have free will.
Why invite any middleman into your transactions to spy on you at all? Tapping a credit card is the easiest thing to do.