fidodo

This ruling seems to be really badly misinterpreted. The case wasn't for people using ai tools to create works but from a computer scientist who created a completely autonomous tool and was trying to co-copyright the works with the tool. Copyright needs human involvement, how much human involvement is still not hard law, but if you integrate the output of an AI and integrate it into a larger work that is very much covered.

That sounds like ea making an excuse for why they were voted worst company. I don't doubt that they got those emails and letters but I doubt that was the major reason they got voted worst. That was a year they had a lot of gaming controversies

I try and follow best practices always too, but when the linter is catching it for you it's less to think about so you can focus on the important parts of the problem

Sure, in this case it was rich idiots spending millions, they're only upset that they missed the opportunity to pawn it off to another idiot first

Even still, they take 30% of a studio's revenue which is a ridiculous amount that's only possible through a near monopoly

Typescript compiler enforces language requirements, the linter enforces language best practices. Best practices help you avoid bugs.

C, it combines the victim into a horrible overlapping monster of body parts

Same reason you use typescript. It helps you catch bugs and follow programming best practices. You also don't need typescript, but with it your code is better. Typescript is technically just a really fancy linter. The actual compilation mainly just removes the type data and does some JavaScript engine compatibility.

You're being tracked but nobody is paying attention.

HP has been shit for decades now, it's not some techie secret. Companies used to live and die by their reputation. What happened?

Why do the typescript extensions to eslint exist then?

Nobody can seem to consistently define what ai even means