fidodo

joined 2 years ago
[–] fidodo@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Agreed. I'm not defending phones in class, just pointing out that there's more work that can be done with lesson plans as well.

[–] fidodo@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I fully support kicking kids off their phones in class, I don't think any lesson no matter how engaging can compete with that. I'm not supposed to be on my phone during meetings, I think it's perfectly reasonable to ban phones from class. I was just commenting that work can be done to make lessons more engaging when phones aren't involved. There's of course a limit to what you can do, and some subjects are just inherently harder to get kids into, like statistics. But seriously good on you for doing that. I'm sure that while it didn't have perfect engagement, it was far better than just teaching it to the book.

Just curious, is there a place you can share that lesson plan to other teachers? It'd be a shame for all that work you did to not get to be used in other classrooms as well.

[–] fidodo@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (4 children)

You can increase motivation to learn by making lessons more engaging even if it's a subject they're not personally interested in. But making lessons more interesting and engaging is not easy and we can't expect all teachers to have the skills and resources to do the research and development needed to produce lesson plans that are really interesting. I think it could be improved by putting more money into developing interesting lesson plans centrally and distributing the materials to teachers to follow instead of just producing dry curriculums. Teachers need support.

[–] fidodo@lemm.ee 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Learn to make your own, then sell them on Etsy, wait, oh no!

[–] fidodo@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes, I'm sure they're still processed but I think it would make sense to give less credence to anonymous tips as they're less likely to be legit or serious than one that someone puts their name on.

[–] fidodo@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

It can be overkill if you need something simple that doesn't match next's defaults, but if the default settings of next work for your use case I found the base project setup very simple to use.

[–] fidodo@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Have you tried using an auto formatter? Let's you write code however and fixes the structure automatically on save. It's way easier for me to write curly braces then hit ctrl+s than have to select multiple lines manually and tab in and out. I feel the biggest gains I've made in productivity came after I learned to embrace tooling.

[–] fidodo@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago

I was taught java my first semester. I certainly hope no schools teach dynamic languages in the first semester.

[–] fidodo@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

To be perfectly frank, I've only seen the drama on social media platforms. Outside of this one library Ive hardly seen anyone trying to fight typescript in the professional community.

[–] fidodo@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I view it more like a powered exoskeleton around a blob fish. IMO static typing is way more valuable than strong typing and I'd take static typing only over strong typing any day if I can only choose one.

[–] fidodo@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't see any practical use case for it as is as anyone wanting to use them would want the full TS feature set anyways, but I could see it being a good step forward for more meaningful features to be added in the future.

[–] fidodo@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Curious if you've used next with react. React itself has a scope rendering design goal and leaves the rest of the app to the community, and next sets up all the stuff around it for you and I think they did a really great job with the defaults they close, and it's still fully extendable.

view more: ‹ prev next ›