fishynoob

joined 6 days ago
[–] fishynoob@infosec.pub 3 points 4 days ago (5 children)

You got an RSS feed for me?

[–] fishynoob@infosec.pub 1 points 4 days ago

Any company that makes affordable washing machines without connecting to the cloud?

[–] fishynoob@infosec.pub 7 points 4 days ago (9 children)

Your blog is awesome. I have always wanted someone to break down RF homelabbing for me and I think as your blog progresses I will find such content.

I'm also looking for blogs/material on OS hardening (Linux/*nix), do you plan to write on that (and any recommendations)?

[–] fishynoob@infosec.pub 8 points 4 days ago

Using a SIM has never been private. Cell phone coverage has always been an instrument of surveillance.

[–] fishynoob@infosec.pub 7 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Coming back to this thread, I do think some of your comments were inflammatory. If you were to receive a ban, it should have been for trying to bring fights in the comments (but even that is ambiguous at best). I agree that the ban for a comment was too much. An admin shouldn't be conflating one such action with overall behaviour. As for "repeated bad-faith behaviour", it is not so far out to ban you I think. People should be responsible for their own actions.

[–] fishynoob@infosec.pub 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I went through the list. Google and FairPhone should definitely be moved to "Safe for now" whilst OnePlus should be moved to "Requires an online account/sacrifice" as they limited their unbrick utility which means no more custom ROMs for new OnePlus phones.

I honestly don't understand why Chinese companies do this. They would fare much better against their American counterparts (including Samsung) if they allowed for more open hardware. Goes to show that MBAs at the top of these companies have utter dung between their ears

[–] fishynoob@infosec.pub 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Thank you for the comment. Definitely looks like there's some interest in hardening Void, with that said most of the kernel protections that I see from your checksec output exist on my Debian system too. I will try it out in a VM then.

[–] fishynoob@infosec.pub -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Mod is biased. There's no 2 ways around it

[–] fishynoob@infosec.pub -3 points 6 days ago

Ban was unjustified. db0 needs to at least point to someone accountable, seeing that he is still the benevolent dictator

[–] fishynoob@infosec.pub 1 points 6 days ago

That means it's likely a problem with DNS.

[–] fishynoob@infosec.pub 3 points 6 days ago (8 children)

Send the link to the discussion and the screenshot of your comment

[–] fishynoob@infosec.pub 1 points 6 days ago

Yeah I'm not going to run them on CPUs, that's not going to be very good. I'll buy the GPUs when I can.

view more: ‹ prev next ›