[-] flamingos@feddit.uk 15 points 2 weeks ago

I wouldn't call Bluesky's federation fake, we'd need a working definition of 'federation' for that, but I would say it lacks meaningful federation.

[-] flamingos@feddit.uk 16 points 2 weeks ago

"Lemmy is the least successful Reddit alternative except from all others which have been tried" -- Abraham Lincoln

[-] flamingos@feddit.uk 15 points 3 weeks ago

I believe this is just a map of Germanic peoples.

[-] flamingos@feddit.uk 16 points 1 month ago

Making the public foot the bill for decades of under-investment as these companies paid out £10s of bns in dividends and continuing on with the failure of privatisation.

[-] flamingos@feddit.uk 15 points 2 months ago

Hey, whores work for their money unlike this waste of sperm.

[-] flamingos@feddit.uk 15 points 2 months ago

Sir Keir has signalled he is open to pursuing an arrangement similar to Italy’s migration deal with Albania, whereby asylum seekers will be held in the Balkan state while their claims are processed.

Thank god they scrapped that gimmicky Rwanda scheme, eh?

[-] flamingos@feddit.uk 16 points 3 months ago

Why does the BBC keep calling the right-wing rioters 'protesters'? Is it purely to draw a false equivalency between the people throwing bricks at mosques, acid attacking people, and burning police cars and the people opposing that?

[-] flamingos@feddit.uk 15 points 4 months ago

The Electoral Reform Society also favours STV, they probably chose AMS here as modeling it from FPTP isn't complete guess work.

[-] flamingos@feddit.uk 15 points 5 months ago

Mammals need to be pregnant to produce milk, so to get cow milk you have to impregnate a cow. That's what they mean by rapist.

76
submitted 5 months ago by flamingos@feddit.uk to c/okmatewanker@feddit.uk
388
Mouldy rule (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 5 months ago by flamingos@feddit.uk to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
16
submitted 5 months ago by flamingos@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

This week, in yet another setback to Rishi Sunak‘s efforts to showcase how the Conservatives have created – over a decade and a half – a robust economy, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) reported that monthly growth in April in the UK had flatlined.

The British economy was said to be struggling with a faltering retail sector, a decline in manufacturing, and a reduction in construction output, after a 0.4% rise in March. The City’s pundits appeared to blame the weather and not the cost-of-living crisis for the lack of growth. The consequences of Brexit, as it seems to be so increasingly, was absent from the finger-pointing.

But this news of the parlous state of the British economy comes amidst more of the same. The UK’s labour productivity had increased by just 0.4% annually over the 12 years following the financial crisis – half the average growth rate seen in the 25 wealthiest OECD countries – and has resulted in a cumulative loss of £10,700 in wage growth for the average worker’s annual salary.

Middle-income individuals in the UK are now 20% poorer than their counterparts in Germany and 9% worse off than those in France.

[…] [T]he UK’s parlous goods exports would be far worse if you did not include the UK’s ‘empty calorie’ trading of global gold. If you took out such high frequency precious metals trading, it would mean that the UK’s goods exports are down some £44 billion since 2018. And that the UK’s goods exports are down, the UK’s service exports are up.

[…] The one silver lining in this dire economic news is that service exports are buoying up the UK economy. Indeed, last year the UK ranked second in the world for such exports – including ICT (Information and communication technology), education, culture, and finance.

The leading nation the UK exports such services to is the United States, where the $129.7 billion of services provided equates to over a quarter of the UK’s entire service export economy (27.6%).
[…]
The Lawyer has noted a 41% year on year increase in revenue by the top 50 US law firms in Britain since 2018: a jump from $5.7bn to $8.1bn. Even factoring in inflation, the rise is 13%. According to The Lawyer in 2021, the top American law firm in the UK was Kirkland & Ellis, and whilst their UK company house listings might not capture all of their UK earnings, it shows a 70% declared rise in profits last year.
[…]
Last month, it was reported that another American law firm, Quinn Emanuel, was offering its newly qualified lawyers in London an eye-watering £180,000 a year, an 18% hike from the year before. Those five years out of qualification will see salaries of £290,000. […] To put this all into context, the London Mayor, Sadiq Khan, earns £160,976. And the London Living Wage is currently set at £13.15 or, roughly, £27,352 a year.
[…]
The income per person in the UK’s richest local authority – Kensington and Chelsea (£52,500) – now stands at 4.5 times that of the poorest – Nottingham (£11,700).
[…]
Last year, hundreds of homeless families were permanently displaced from London by local councils, with little notice, or choice. The escalating rents in the capital, which have surpassed the local housing allowance (LHA) – the amount private tenants on housing benefits are entitled to for rent, varying by local authority – have driven these forced relocations.

The campaign group Housing Action Southwark and Lambeth (HASL) reported in 2023 that 319 households accepted private tenancies outside London. These families were frequently given 24-hour ultimatums by council officials to accept homes outside the capital or risk being classified as “intentionally homeless” for refusing the offer.

20
submitted 5 months ago by flamingos@feddit.uk to c/okmatewanker@feddit.uk
77
submitted 5 months ago by flamingos@feddit.uk to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
12
submitted 5 months ago by flamingos@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

Archive/No Paywall

A Labour manifesto that brings the railways into public ownership, strengthens workers’ rights and removes tax exemptions for private schools (all policies from 2017 and 2019 manifestos) should be universally welcomed.

But what lies beneath is far more sinister. The 2024 Labour manifesto bakes in austerity for our public services. By ruling out redistributive taxation, it de facto accepts existing spending plans that the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) says mean cuts to unprotected departments of between 1.9 per cent and 3.5 per cent per year. Austerity baked in.
[…]
The IFS has said there is a “conspiracy of silence” between the two major parties about the scale of cuts that is baked into the current economic plans. The Resolution Foundation estimates that implies upwards of £19bn of cuts in non-protected departments.

Nothing in Labour’s manifesto changes that analysis. The tax changes Labour has announced (mostly reforming non-dom status and removing tax breaks for private schools) amount to around £7bn in extra revenue – and that has already been earmarked […]

Across the public sector, from nursing to care workers, from teachers to junior doctors, there is a recruitment and retention crisis. Unless you restore public sector pay, you will not solve those staffing shortages, or tackle the NHS backlogs. It’s also not clear from the manifesto where any additional funding would come from to fund the private sector operations that shadow Health Secretary Wes Streeting has promised, leaving the worrying conclusion that they may come out of existing NHS budgets.

[…] Both councils and universities need an injection of cash, or we will all lose out. The courts have massive backlogs and child poverty has risen to 4.3 million due to decades of benefit cuts – none of which are being reversed by Labour’s new manifesto.
[…]
But as Labour has become ever more reliant on wealthy and corporate donors, so it seems their tax policy has been diluted. He who pays the piper calls the tune.

If you want a snappy summary of Keir Starmer’s “changed Labour Party”, it was pithily provided by Kay Burley earlier this year: “Labour’s happy to cap child benefit, but not bankers’ bonuses”.

13
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by flamingos@feddit.uk to c/backend@feddit.uk

Edit: Finally completed! Sorry it took so long, there was a memory leak I was confusing for the upgrade.

As mentioned here, we need to upgrade Pict-rs to 0.5 for Lemmy 0.19.4 (well we don't strictly need to for 0.19.4, but this is something we have to do eventually). I don't have a reference for how long this will take, but it'll probably be a few hours.

Some downtime on Lemmy will happen as there's some changes to our deployment I want to make, but I'm going to try to keep the instance up while Pict-rs is doing its thing. If it eats too much RAM/CPU though, I may take Lemmy down. Join the Matrix room to stay updated.

853
submitted 5 months ago by flamingos@feddit.uk to c/okmatewanker@feddit.uk
137
Dutch rule (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 5 months ago by flamingos@feddit.uk to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
39
don' be 'orrid 'enry (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 5 months ago by flamingos@feddit.uk to c/okmatewanker@feddit.uk
1
submitted 5 months ago by flamingos@feddit.uk to c/feddituk@feddit.uk

Today marks the one year anniversary of our humble little instance. It's been an eventful year but, despite fate's best efforts, we're still here. So go us! (or boo us if you think we suck)

85
sanist royalist (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 5 months ago by flamingos@feddit.uk to c/okmatewanker@feddit.uk
[-] flamingos@feddit.uk 16 points 6 months ago

I think it's the thing that gives your account avatar cat ears. But IDK, I don't use Misskey.

[-] flamingos@feddit.uk 15 points 7 months ago

Jesse, you need to stop eating Full Englishes. They're not good for you Jesse!

[-] flamingos@feddit.uk 16 points 1 year ago

If only Ben was wiser.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

flamingos

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF