glizzyguzzler

Mr crabs would use unethical llms, very accurate

naughty cord naughty cord naughty cord (because those plugs are into rope play)

Thanks for revealing I will investigate!

How did you embed alt text with the image like that uwu

This is 2D can yuo generalize to 2nd variable ?

schlep schlep schlep schlep schlep schlep schlep schlep schlep schlep

g-g-g-guzzled😭😭😭😭😭😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞😞

I can never look at it, because honry is all I got

Glorious

God why

This statement is at least twofold:

1 - it says “I do not have to debate to ensure I have basic human rights”, a statement that is clearly true in every instance.

2 - it is a reaction to bad-faith “debating” used as an attack tactic by oppressors; read up on sealioning: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning

Combine those two facts, and you have people weaponizing “I’m just debating” to keep someone in an unending treadmill of debate where they constantly have to try to prove they deserve basic human rights. It’s actually hell.

Good faith debate and discourse on all key topics the media/gov pushes on us right now has been long settled, none of it is new, so someone actually willing to learn can just search “do trans people deserve basic human rights” or “can minorities be discriminated against by systemic factors” and there’s already robust answers that should not shock you!

No need to make a trans person make a case over and over again that they deserve to live or a Palestinian make a case that the system within which they live is an open-air jail. And that is what this person is saying.

How does doggo do it?? The accuracy to within +/-3 days always, seriously impressive