[-] gnomicutterance@awful.systems 2 points 4 months ago

they probably do. I worked for a content-as-a-service company that had a contract to deliver our product, airgapped, to a three-letter agency on a regular schedule, and we were a tiny company. Microsoft's biggest customer is probably the U.S. government; I'd be shocked if they don't provide an in-house airgapped set of full Azure services for the entire intelligence agency system.

[-] gnomicutterance@awful.systems 4 points 4 months ago

I’m sure they would find some way¹ to ruin it, but it would be fun if we could convince them to pass a law in some vice-signaling US state that bans private equity’s purchase of every vet and general contractor and empty house.

¹ Anti-semitism, probably.

[-] gnomicutterance@awful.systems 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It is not, in fact, bad that copyright applies to a wider group than publishers, unless you are using "publisher" extremely broadly to apply to "creators".

If "someone gets attacked for posting an image on social media", that rarely means "lawyers came after me because I posted a screenshot of a page from Sandman". It often means that the poster took someone else's art, snipped off the artist's signature, and posted without attribution, and the artist is rightfully angry. Copyright is what enables that artist to continue to eat and make more art. The same goes for music, or software, or movies.

Sure, the system is horribly abused by uneven power structures, as every system in the world is. For music especially, we all know that the takedowns are usually issued by people who have nothing to do with the creation of the protected work, because of the way licensing and rights grants work in that industry. Automated takedown systems (which have to exist because of the scale of online content) also have no reasonable appeal mechanism, and the people making the decisions don't (and can't) make reasonable assessments about fair use and transformative works.

I'm not saying that everyone who participates in piracy is a bad, wicked thief--I absolutely participate in it myself. But copyright is not the villain here; that's just trying to make us feel justified about our actions. Someone made a creative work I enjoyed, and I don't have a moral right to the product of their effort for free.

[-] gnomicutterance@awful.systems 3 points 5 months ago

Just a conspiracy of cartographers then.

[-] gnomicutterance@awful.systems 4 points 5 months ago

One day I’ll read the dissertations that must exist on those reactionaries and ancaps who adored the aesthetic of Occupy but still loved the idea of wealth consolidation, social norms enforced by power, and state violence used to violently suppress protest and disorder.

[-] gnomicutterance@awful.systems 4 points 5 months ago

you're not wrong.

[-] gnomicutterance@awful.systems 4 points 5 months ago

Death to Chronos!

[-] gnomicutterance@awful.systems 5 points 6 months ago

You saw another reference to girlyman? There was a period a decade ago when I played their music constantly and went to every show I could.)

view more: ‹ prev next ›

gnomicutterance

joined 6 months ago