ineffable

joined 2 years ago
[–] ineffable@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

Classic skullet

[–] ineffable@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Do you have to sign in to Bluesky to see all content, or just videos?

[–] ineffable@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Boom headshot

[–] ineffable@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

And of course a Simpsons reference

[–] ineffable@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] ineffable@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

I did not, but I do now!

[–] ineffable@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Now do your usernma

[–] ineffable@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] ineffable@sh.itjust.works 19 points 5 months ago

Germany's Left Party wants to halve billionaires...

[–] ineffable@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Ow mein arsh

[–] ineffable@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It's another clickbait article about roads with no intent but to rile people up

You are correct about uncontrolled intersections, this suggests we could remove the separate pedestrian signals at traffic lights

As shown in the image: "Pedestrians walking the same diection as main road traffic share the same green light"

As you say (and included in the article) there's a stunningly obvious reason we don't do this already: pedestrians are vulnerable, and we can make good estimates about how long the pedestrian red should be to allow safe crossing

Just put 'making intersections less safe' over there on the garbage pile with 'speed has no impact on the likelihood or severity of accidents'

view more: next ›