irotsoma
Yeah, software patents in the US especially, have become a way for companies to either kill competition, or make buying up ridiculous patents and suing for infringement their primary source of income.
Primary issue is the patent office has few officers that are technical enough to understand the overlap of the specific industry and software. So, they tend to just allow anything, especially from larger companies that they're told to assume have the expertise if they don't since their load is too large to have time to learn new stuff and truly research if something is obvious or not.
YouTube did make some changes to their terms primarily for creators that get paid for content. They added some new LLM-based scanning of content to find stuff that is too repetitive or didn't contain enough original content. Assuming the creators you looked at have mostly original content rather than remixing of content which may be misinterpreted by LLMs as not being "original enough", they could be falling victim to overaggressive hits if they use a consistent format in their content since LLMs don't really understand context, only patterns.
I'd be interested to find out if the creators got any notification from YouTube on the reason for removal of the content.
Make sure to do a test during peak and a test during trough.
I do that and then average them. They are always significantly different and i use patches which give a more steady dose than injections.
Also, I'm not entirely convinced that the values most doctors who are not specialists use are correct for trans people. If you aren't seeing an endocrinologist with at least a little specialty in sex hormones, I'd do that and see if they can recommend the right levels for your body rather than the general numbers that were always very conservative, and came from cis women's levels rather than what trans people need since there's usually no funding to research trans people.
I was lucky enough to start HRT with a general practitioner with a lot of experience with trans people during her residency and most of her career. But she moved on to another specialty due to the difficulty making ends meet as a good doctor. I'm on the lookout myself for an endo with good experience to consult one of these days.
Better get rid of all the Christian content, black people kissing white people, move back to not allowing married characters to sit on the same bed unless their feet are firmly on the floor, and anything else that doesn't represent all people. Heck, we probably need to hide bodies and faces of every actor so you can't see their faces or body shapes. I mean men don't want to see women on TV and vice versa since they can't relate, right?
Then that should be the questions asked, not some arbitrary "sex" question with only some of the possible answers as options.
It should be apparent, especially now, that those things never were never enough to determine these things anyway. There are tons of types of intersex people which are not an insignificant percentage of the population.
So, there are some things that loosely follow AGAB for the majority of people, but the assumptions made based on that, end up causing more trouble for those whose bodies don't conform. And that's not a small portion of the population. Basically between intersex people and trans people who have had HRT and/or surgery are at very, very conservative estimates, around 3%, but since there's no finding and it's now unsafe to track even in the US and UK and other western countries, it's likely much higher in reality. These people are poorly served by the current system of AGAB only.
For me, many of my lab tests show abnormal because it should ask what is my body's primary sex hormone or ask to select for the specific test, what range is normal for my body if they want to get it really right. And honestly, body weight is more impactful on a lot of things anyway, why aren't we asking that of every person (rhetorical question, but essentially asking if you were born with or the doctors modified your body at birth to have something that looked closer to a penis than a vulva, should be just as uncouth)? Also, insurance won't pay for gynecology/urology kind of stuff or mammograms or prostate cancer screenings even if you have the right body parts to need it, if your AGAB is wrong without a long and drawn out process each and every time to prove you have the right part. Heck it's not even good for marketing if you have the wrong one listed because it has to be your AGAB rather than the gender you present as and thus the high profit products you're most likely to use.
So it really has a low usefulness compared to asking more relevant questions whether for medical or commercial reasons.
Same. I have had a few types of headache issues most of my life and no one believed the pain was that bad because I don't express it the way people expect when in severe pain. So, I always thought I had a low tolerance until a doctor freaked out at some severe tibial stress fractures that I was still being asked to run on them. And it took faking a painful yell when the doctor was manipulating it in the first visit to get the bone scan ordered to get to that freak out. I just don't uncontrollably verbalize severe pain or fully shut down or things like that like neurotypicals.
Seems like the issue is going to be structural integrity over time. You're either going to need to reinforce it by running straps of strong fabric from the belt line to the places where they are attached, or use really thick material for the pants and just reinforce the actual spots where it's sewn in. Likely using straps will make it look nicer so that stuff in pockets isn't making them get stretched weird, but will be more expensive and making it comfortable will mean adding another layer of material over the straps on the inside. Either way, seems like these would be kind of expensive to make.
Fortunately, I've also got autism... That's fortunate, right?
So they could only find 4 shootings and had to somehow make it sound like a lot. Just goes to show you can make statistics say anything if you don't care about reality.
Yeah, I have an X on my ID so even though it's technically valid for air travel, I brought my passport instead which has my AGAB and wore really loose fitting clothes. Fortunately I didn't have to go through the x-ray that would give away that my body parts don't match my passport.
I wiped all of my devices in case I was detained, not that I have anything to hide, but I don't want to out any of my friends as trans for them to get targeted.
And I've been staying away from public bathrooms despite having a hard time holding my bladder due to some medical issues retaining salt and water. Considering getting a catheter or something for when I'm in public for more than a few hours because dehydrating myself all the time isn't good for my health.
It's really scary right now even living in a fairly progressive leaning state. I won't even think about traveling to my hometown to visit family where it's more conservative. I'm really hoping on the flight back I'm able to slip through security again. It's going to be a lot of paperwork to get my birth certificate changed to what isn't actually my gender since that's not an option, but more closely matches my body parts.
It's sad that just existing means you are classified as a terrorist and have to avoid interacting with society to survive.
Stay away from the US if you can if you are trans, intersex, non-binary, or even cis if you just have some facial traits that make you look a little less like your AGAB. It's only getting worse every day.
Probably just to try to make Garmin's product less useful in the short term while the case drags out. Or as a way to get Garmin to acquire them. Strava basically seems to have bought up some competitors that were failing and they have been on the way downhill. So at this stage usually these companies start cost cutting and using any means necessary to increase their perceived value for sale. This gives Garmin an incentive to buy them as that would end the lawsuit and they'd then acquire some additional defensive patents.