[-] kraniax@lemmy.wtf 6 points 1 year ago

But the comments where not removed by mods. It seems like the commenter removed them.

[-] kraniax@lemmy.wtf 5 points 1 year ago

Brave is known to take privacy (and security) more seriously than its contenders. It's therefore unsurprising to find it recommended by Privacy Guides.

At least in the privacy community, Brave isn’t super popular. It feels more geared towards the "hyped crypto early adopters". Brave inclusion in privacy guides has always been controversial.

Brave is ultimately an advertising company, they base their business model in ads. And everyone knows how bad that can turn.

Ungoogled Chromium on the other hand takes patches from brave and other Chromium based browsers, removing every bit of telemetry and giving you the cleanest experience you can get on Chromium, without relying on a shady company.

[-] kraniax@lemmy.wtf 6 points 1 year ago

the day I don't find a provider with IMAP support is the day I'll leave email for good. You won't force me to use your absurdly bloated and full of telemetry web clients or your incompatible encryption.

OpenPGP + NeoMutt has been my email workflow for 10 years now.

[-] kraniax@lemmy.wtf 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

sure, a company that has used petabytes of data they do not own any rights of to train their models are totally excluding their own customers data when turning a switch off.

yeah, I totally trust OpenAI and Microsoft with my data. It's not like Microsoft is spying on me after turning of Windows telemetry either.

[-] kraniax@lemmy.wtf 5 points 1 year ago

the architecture doesn't contain something like Intel ME. but it's MIT licensed and if Qualcomm, AMD or Intel decides to produce RISC-V chips they could (and probably will) use proprietary extensions and even include a ME-like coprocessor which locks down the whole thing.

[-] kraniax@lemmy.wtf 6 points 1 year ago

it's trivial to mass convert mobi to a widely supported format. I think this is a welcomed change, because Amazon was the only one on the industry still promoting a legacy format like mobi, even if they tried to start moving on with their newer formats.

[-] kraniax@lemmy.wtf 10 points 1 year ago

no need for that! people can just take an apk and slap ads or malware on top. they do it all the time with fake candy crush apks. So I'm pretty sure they won't care about this license.

I think that in this case it's just a excuse so no one is redistributing the app and they can make money from it.

[-] kraniax@lemmy.wtf 28 points 1 year ago

Still no CoreBoot support, so it's a hard pass for me. I wish they worked on it, they promised it back in 2020.

[-] kraniax@lemmy.wtf 9 points 1 year ago

use a real operative system then

[-] kraniax@lemmy.wtf 25 points 1 year ago

how is this related to technology exactly? sadly, people of all kinds of professions are killed everyday. This belongs to a general news community, not to technology.

And to be clear, I'm just saying that this is the wrong community, not that I have anything against that poor person (even if the word CEO causes me repulsion at sight)

[-] kraniax@lemmy.wtf 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No centralized services, please. I'd vote for either XMPP or SimpleX. IRC will also work for me.

view more: next ›

kraniax

joined 1 year ago