what do you do with it?
same same same
can anyone please point me to some piece of writing that explains how IA didn't willfully self destruct?
everything i read about this legal action, even when I read IA's stuff about, sounds moronic. doomed to fail and lose big for themselves and for others by setting a loser precident.
It's great that these projects already exist
but it hurts accessibility that you need to be "in the know" to find out about it.
every media outlet has to mention WayBackMachine; it's such a great outreach and legitimizing
Ive always used cryptsetup and never seen any intructions like how you are describing. I wonder if you have a different use case than I do? It seems like adding more complexity to start with one decryption method only to change it soon. Why?
Dont just consider if its "legal". But also if it is aligned with institution policy.
Depending on the details maybe it would be the kind of thing theyd have to declare when publishing? Like as a conflict of interest.
Could be other equity type avenues depending on details.
But all our tripod, angelfire, geocities etc websites were little art projects.
and there are websites like https://wiby.me/ that exist to assist people in finding the old-type content.
I agree. So much of the web now functionally happens on the socials which are not indexed/accessible to crawlers.
I'm the opposite
Them: You should check out this show I've been watching, it's great. Do you have Disn-----
Me: I can get anything online. How do you spell the name of the show? Thanks for the rec. If you need help getting anything you aren't subscribed to let me know.