Er, yes. It's one of the main features being introduced in 3.0. I don't know why you would just assume they're not adding it without looking it up. It made quite a bit of noise when it started being in the works.
WebKit isn't dead and is being used by GNOME Web.
Because it doesn't matter for most apps. XWayland works fine.
Even Blender says if it fails to use Wayland it will use X11.
What are you trying to say? Of course it does. Pretty much every Linux app still supports X11, because a lot of people are still using X11. Only exception I'm aware of is Waydroid.
This entire thing is just idealism vs pragmatism for the trillionth time. The idealists are mad because they think all ads are bad and we shouldn't try to work with advertisers in any capacity. They do not believe reducing the harmfulness of ads is a valid approach, because that would be an acknowledgement of ads. Common talking points there are about how this is technically working with advertisers and how the internet shouldn't have ads in the first place.
The pragmatics also think ads are bad, but believe that an Internet without ads is very unlikely to happen, so they believe attempting to reduce the harmfulness of ads is a valid approach. Common talking points there are about how this isn't giving advertisers anything they don't already have and about how this doesn't matter if you're using an adblocker.
Like all other debates of this type, this probably isn't ever going to be resolved to anyone's satisfaction and we've really just been seeing the same talking points over and over again since the beginning. So I hope y'all have fun duking it out, I don't think I'm gonna bother looking at these pointless PPA threads anymore.
There is no such thing as a fully uncontacted tribe. The term is used to refer to peoples that choose to remain in isolation. Therefore, "uncontacted" and "reclusive" can more or less be used interchangeably.
this is just going to cause indexers to ignore robots.txt
Wine doesn't wait for major versions to merge major features. Major versions like Wine 9.0 are considered stable and are preceded by a feature freeze and multiple release candidates. Minor versions like Wine 9.9 are not, they're just released every two weeks from the master branch. This means nearly all of Wine 9.0's killer features were already present in the final Wine 8.21 minor version. The same will be true with Wine 10. Wayland support will continue to improve incrementally in the coming versions.
especially considering KDE already has an application with almost exactly the same name for the same purpose https://invent.kde.org/utilities/alpaka
is this flamebait? we really don't need this stale-ass debate revived for the millionth time. everything that had to be said has been said and no one is going to budge from their positions. there is nothing to be gained from reposting some old controversial 2021 blog post about this outside of more flaming. it's time to move on. this is a waste of everyone's time.
if you're a developer, support themes if you want to support them, don't support them if you don't. if you're a user, use the apps you want to use. if you care about theming, use the apps that support it. if you don't, good for you. there doesn't need to be anything more to it.
So just to clarify, there's no way to support the DualShock 3 without introducing a security hole? Or is the security hole only a problem with the current driver which could eventually be fixed, rather than something inherent to the device? Also, is there a list of affected devices outside the DualShock 3? Will the Wiimote still work, for instance?
The DualShock is old, but I've always appreciated how I could have all of my gamepads just work on Linux, from the Wiimote to the DualSense. On Windows, most of them needed third party unofficial drivers to be installed and/or would be missing functionality, like motion controls or Bluetooth support. Would be a big shame if it just stopped working wirelessly. Still, I have a lot of significantly better gamepads by now, including a DualSense, so DualShock 3 support isn't something I really need anymore unless I have a lot of people over and need to connect a lot of controllers.
It never occurred to me before reading this comment that there actually is a use case for the execute permission. To me it was always just this annoying thing I have to do whenever I download an executable which I didn't have to do on Windows.
Man, this guy does not give up. Respect, honestly. Hope for the best this time.