[-] man_in_space@kbin.social 82 points 1 year ago
  • You heard about that recent study trying to say that Indo-European speakers came from Anatolia? Classic case of people from another subject of study thinking their own experience and conventions transfer across fields. The dataset is supposedly very good but their theoretical framework and conclusions aren’t.

  • Your language isn’t the world’s oldest/first language.

  • That includes Sanskrit. It isn’t the Ur-language either. Sorry not sorry.

  • Neither is Albanian.

  • Nor Arabic.

  • Or Tamil.

  • Turkish neither.

  • Not all languages came from Latin—in fact, most didn’t. It’s a quirk of history that Romance (and Indo-European generally) spread so far and wide

  • Indo-European language theory is correct regardless of whether you choose to believe it.

  • Russia may be Satan’s dacha, but that doesn’t change the fact that Russian is a real language (and a Slavic one, to boot). Also, when I cite George Shevelov, you don’t get to write him off as a propagandist; he is Ukrainian, not Russian (somebody tried to do that to me last weekend, refusing to even consider the idea because his last name looks Russian).

  • Black people (or whatever minority of your choice) don’t speak “bad English” or whatever other language. African-American Vernacular English in particular is a well-studied lect—a language variety—with a ton of scholarship behind it; it isn’t arbitrary (“he eating” and “he be eating” have different meanings/connotations; they don’t just drop words for no reason—there’s logic to it).

  • “I could care less” is an idiom. The fact that it is so widely used and understood makes it a part of proper English. That’s the yardstick in linguistics: The crowd tends to win. (Or do the complainants never say things like “I read it a million times” or “it was a billion degrees out and humid”?)

  • Words like “supposably”, “liberry”, “expresso”, and “conversate” are analogically extended forms. Sound change and grammar change happen all the time. If you have issues with them, you will have issues with “tenth” (the original form of this word, tithe, survived as a specialized form), “snuck” (sneak is originally a weak verb, not a strong one), or “messenger” and “passenger” (analogy with challenger).

  • BONUS ROUND: The Armenian genocide DID HAPPEN. I was quite smugly told by a Turkish nationalist to “read the court case” as I was wrong…in which case THE JUDGES AGREED THAT IT HAPPENED and were only concerned with whether the right to deny history exists. I also got libeled as a racist “Cizvit” (“Jesuit”) for some reason. Same guy tried to pull the “Turkish is the mother of all languages” card, even saying that Native American languages came from Turkish. (Which is facially implausible. North American languages are often front-loading whereas Turkic likes to suffix.)

[-] man_in_space@kbin.social 59 points 1 year ago

Linguistics.

A stupefying proportion of what mass media and everyday people think they know about linguistics and languages is wrong. Unfortunately, they do not appreciate corrections.

[-] man_in_space@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m bipolar. Something like this happens practically every time I find myself in an episode.

More recently it was when I realized my band wasn’t going to make it.

[-] man_in_space@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

If /kbin had a BestOf, this would go there.

[-] man_in_space@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago

I thought Eleanor Roosevelt was Black. I have no idea how I got that idea and it stuck with me until partway through college.

[-] man_in_space@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

Electronics stores sometimes sell static discharge bracelets. You put it on your wrist and then there’s a cord that goes to an alligator clip or something and you can touch it to metal to discharge the pent-up electricity. I had to do that at mine old workplace—the air there was so dry, and my legs so hairy, that static charge would build up from my pants. I had a static discharge once that was so loud someone came over to ask if I was all right; it stopped when I started wearing the bracelet.

69
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by man_in_space@kbin.social to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world

Not sure where else to post this besides here…if it’s more appropriate somewhere else, please direct me there.

31, male, virgin, autism, bipolar, socially awkward, ostracized growing up, hit with the ugly stick.

I have decided to end the search for a romantic partner in the face of 100% failure over the past decade and a half. The idea that everyone has a soulmate is bullshit, and I’m one of the ones who doesn’t. I have not found anyone who seems to want me (there was a brief LDR but she was psychotic, as I quickly found, and things ended very shortly after they began), and given my near-total lack of experience I don’t see any point in making any further efforts.

I cannot change how anyone sees me nor can I compel anyone to view me in a certain light. Whatever flaws I possess in addition to those already mentioned are, apparently, deep-rooted and systemic to the point that I don’t know what I need to change about myself, nor do I think at this point that it’s even possible (or indeed worth it).

I have tried to make my peace with this. Every time I think I’ve done it, though, something comes up and I’m back to square one again. (This time around it was a random manic or mixed episode.) I am in therapy, but these matters persist in causing me negative effects on my mental and physical health. The term “touch-starved” has been applied to me, among others.

I need to put this issue to rest in order to actually move on and do things with my life. How do I subdue and get over the desire for companionship?

[-] man_in_space@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago

Well…I've only had one girlfriend but the breakup wasn't really bad (she was psycho and basically gave me an ultimatum; I called her on it). I did, however, get bailed on on a date once. That stung.

[-] man_in_space@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

I have a few.

  • Linguistics/languages. It's what I majored in. Unfortunately, being a linguist on the Internet is a Sisyphean task—when you point out that language changes and doesn't always mean what you think it should mean, people get upset.

  • Related to the above, conlangs (constructed languages—e.g. Klingon, anything Tolkien, Sangheili (sp?) from Halo, Na'vi). It's a very niche hobby.

  • My Little Pony. I am a dude. I like the wholesomeness; it's a break from everything else being gritty and dark.

  • Music theory. Like, deep music theory. Meshuggah counting? Microtones? Obscure composers and releases? I love that shit.

  • Star Trek. nuq vIjatlh DaneH'a'?

14

I have some ideas, but I don’t think I would be so lucky to actually try to get things made in Hollywood, so I’ve a mind to produce it myself (it worked for Shane Carruth). I don’t know where I’d go or what research I’d need to conduct to embark on such an undertaking. Is there a community somewhere or some notable figures who are disposed to give advice to a first-time filmmaker?

39
submitted 1 year ago by man_in_space@kbin.social to c/memes@lemmy.ml
[-] man_in_space@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Night of the Living Dead has always been in the public domain because someone in the distribution chain neglected to include a copyright notice. (This has since been addressed, e.g. by the Berne Convention.)

Fun fact: One (I forget which specifically) of the old Rankin-Bass specials is also in the public domain because when they included the copyright notice, they rendered the date in Roman numerals but screwed it up—they omitted one of the “M”s, so as far as the USCO was concerned, it dates to the Tenth Century.

[-] man_in_space@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago

The bronies are still alive and well, it seems.

[-] man_in_space@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

“Were” is cognate to Latin vir ‘man’—cf. “werewolf” (‘man-wolf’).

“Woman” comes from a compound meaning “woman-person” (wif-mæn, cf. “wife”); a man was a wæpned-mæn (“weapon-person” or “penis-person”). The lexical narrowing of “man” to mean ‘male’ happened later, and it was indeed originally a gender-neutral term.

0

Maybe we can get out ahead of the trend.

view more: next ›

man_in_space

joined 1 year ago