No organization was spending more on foreign influence and media reportage than USAid. So of course the UK wants to fill the void. They're the voice of Anglo Saxony! They don't speak for this anglo-saxon (by heritage). /s
marathon01
joined 4 weeks ago
The fool doesn't play poker!
That's a good kick in the 🥜 🥜 😱
Deleted bc I crossed the line.
P.S. I’ve personally been to Ukraine and also know people who are currently there. So I’ll take my first person account over you or you’re purposely misleading article.
I bet you have! /s What part of Ukraine did you visit, East or West? And from which part of Ukraine did the person(s) you talked to come from? Context is everything. Also, you may want to brush up on some unchallengeable history—An actual timeline of events, if you wish to honestly enlighten yourself. https://consortiumnews.com/2025/02/25/ukraine-timeline-tells-the-tale
consortium news
Another data point for you: https://www.biasly.com/sources/consortiumnews-bias-rating/
Fact checking sites aren't reliable. Consortium News is run and was founded by world-class investigative journalists who won Pulitzer's. So I'll take them over a “fact checking” site. You must think people are stupid.
The same Reuters that received USAid. LOL
Quite welcome — This is why I've left the Canadian left.
You obviously didn't read or understand the article. 🤦🏽♂️
Then Russia will probably occupy the entire country. Ukraine won't have anything to fight with, as NATO can't supply them with the quantity needed, and even then, they'd lose to a much larger, motivated army. They simply can't compete militarily.