[-] metic@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

I hate that posting into the void feeling. I blame that more on the microblog format more than any particular platform.

[-] metic@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

“That is not how biological scientists define the word ‘drive’.”

Her argument basic boils down to semantics.

[-] metic@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Many years ago I posted a true story on r/nosleep or r/letsnotmeet (forget which) bc I didn’t realize most of those stories are fake. It was frustrating to realize my weird situation that I wanted other people to know about and empathize with me about (bc the cops did nothing) was largely ignored.

[-] metic@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Haven’t been proven wrong so far. I’d love it for the human race to get it together and take its existential threats seriously, but it seems world leaders would rather have pointless wars over territory and argue about cultural issues.

[-] metic@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Networked, autonomous local communities.

[-] metic@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

I noticed posting from lemmy.world is really buggy. I started composing in another app as a failsafe. Kbin doesn’t seem to have this issue, and maybe other Lemmy instances don’t either.

0
submitted 1 year ago by metic@kbin.social to c/chinese@lemmy.world
1
submitted 1 year ago by metic@kbin.social to c/taiwan@lemmy.world
1
[-] metic@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Everyone would ask them about what was going on behind the scenes and if Spez is as short-sighted as he seems. They’d reply they signed NDAs about most of the questions being asked and quickly regret creating a spontaneous AMA and then never log in under that username again.

0
submitted 1 year ago by metic@kbin.social to c/AskKbin@kbin.social

Not that I’m complaining; nice to not be inundated with beans.

I’d assume with federation the active posts would mostly be the same on both.

Edit: I think it may partly have to do with how voting works differently between Lemmy and Kbin.

1
1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by metic@kbin.social to c/debatereligion@lemmy.world

Over the history of philosophy and religion numerous works of metaphysical speculation have been written. Many of these metaphysical models are mutually exclusive. This bewildering variety of metaphysics naturally induces a skepticism of all metaphysical systems. No particular metaphysics can be be proven empirically. Metaphysicians must recourse to either theophany or reasoning; in practice usually a combination of the two. Others cannot access the same theophany or may dispute their logic.

Materialism cannot escape this skepticism. Materialism (or physicalism) is the current prestige metaphysics in the modern world, but it has not earned this position on the basis of its veracity. Science as the study of physical or social phenomena, does not concern itself with non-physical phenomena. It is instrumentally materialist, regardless of the individual scientist’s metaphysical views. Although science uses materialism as a working assumption, it does not and cannot attempt to prove it, nor any other metaphysical model. The prestige materialism currently enjoys is a result of people mistaking this instrumentality for veracity.

1
1

metic

joined 1 year ago