Or you could use a gui that is probably already on your system, like I said. Maybe Ubuntu just sucks, I don't have experience with it. But I have used flatpak on SteamOS, which is incredibly easy and smooth.

But the terminal can be super easy too, it's not like you're typing out complicated commands just to install software. I use yay, so it's literally just 'yay ' to search and install.

Just because you are already used to Windows doesn't mean it's simple. It's actually more convoluted and difficult to learn if someone hasn't used either.

On windows, you have to go to the software's website, find the download page, click download, run the installer exe, then click through the installation wizard.

On Linux, you can either install it in one command in the terminal, or install in one click from a gui. You almost certainly have a gui app store preinstalled unless you choose a minimal distro like Arch.

If you want to update software on Windows, you go through that whole process again. On Linux, you just do a system update.

I'm not really sure what part of that is easier on Windows

I don't know the particular details of this plan, but the article you shared seems to focus on problems
with uranium. I don't see thorium as having any of these problems. I'm not a nuclear scientist, but thorium seems like a no-brainer. One of the main reasons we use uranium in the first place is just because that fuel cycle is more convenient if we're also making nukes.

There are very few things that make me proud to be American, but I do love when people from other countries are horrified by "normal" American stuff.

It is quite convenient, though, and better than food going to a landfill. (although composting is still preferable)

That song is literally nonsense meant to confuse people who overanalyze their songs. It's not meant to be 'deep' haha.

You don't have to like them, but there's a reason why I and so many others think they're fantastic.

Absolutely, these corporate types are so clueless when it comes to public messaging.

They realized that it's obvious that they're the bad guys, and the interview response wasn't convincing. But then to try to bully the interviewer into deleting it? That just seems stupid.

While I like the concept, I can't help but prefer '!?' or '?!'. There's more granularity of meaning, and I think it just looks nicer having two or more separate characters.

I have to disagree. A good electric toothbrush makes a big difference, personally.

I 100% agree. I don't mind design refreshes. I think I'm in the minority of loving the current Firefox logo.

But this just sucks. They really took their unique, clever wordmark logo (but still very modern and minimal!) and replaced it with a bland, trendy 2022 typeface.

I know this is super petty, but this might convince me to find another password manager and method for syncing tabs. Might try librewolf, too. Rebranding invites users to re-evaluate their view on a brand, and mine isn't changing for the better.

I think the solution is just that anything AI generated should be public domain.

Why is this a bad things? It's just a meme. It's not like they were going to hire an artist for this.

Deep Rock seriously needs to invest in some better equipment.