[-] msgraves@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 month ago

One of the worst parts of this boom in LLM models is the fact that they can "invade" online spaces and control a narrative. For an example, just go on twitter and scroll to the comments on any tagesschau (german news site) post- it's all rightwing bots and crap. LLMs do have uses, but the big problem is that a bad actor can basically control any narrative with the amount of sheer crap they can output. And OpenAI does nothing- even though they are the biggest provider. It earns them money, after all.

I also can't really think of a good way to combat this. If you would verify people using an ID, you basically nuke all semblance of online anonymity. If you have some sort of captcha, it will probably be easily bypassed- it doesn't even need to be tricked. Just pay some human in a country with extremely cheap labour that will solve it for your bot. It really sucks.

[-] msgraves@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 6 months ago
[-] msgraves@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 6 months ago

This is hurting my head

[-] msgraves@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 7 months ago

-> i‘m in this rule and I don’t like it

136
hot robot rule (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

I love hot gay sex with a cute robot and a cute angel (I want him to peg me)

i know, corpo twitter account :(

[-] msgraves@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 7 months ago

why yes, I do enjoy being bottomless around the house

[-] msgraves@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 7 months ago
[-] msgraves@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Ich würde gerne mal den prompt für diesen Chatbot sehen „Du bist rechtsextrem..“

[-] msgraves@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 8 months ago

80% of r/thinkpad

(the other 20% are femboys, catgirls, enby or trans)

[-] msgraves@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 8 months ago

ok, fair; but do consider the context that the models are open weight. You can download them and use them for free.

There is a slight catch though which I’m very annoyed at: it’s not actually Apache. It’s this weird license where you can use the model commercially up until you have 700M Monthly users, which then you have to request a custom license from meta. ok, I kinda understand them not wanting companies like bytedance or google using their models just like that, but Mistral has their models on Apache-2.0 open weight so the context should definitely be reconsidered, especially for llama3.

It’s kind of a thing right now- publishers don’t want models trained on their books, „because it breaks copyright“ even though the model doesn’t actually remember copyrighted passages from the book. Many arguments hinge on the publishers being mad that you can prompt the model to repeat a copyrighted passage, which it can do. IMO this is a bullshit reason

anyway, will be an interesting two years as (hopefully) copyright will get turned inside out :)

[-] msgraves@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 8 months ago

ohno my copyright!!!! How will the publisher megacorps now make a record quarter??? Think of the shareholders!

[-] msgraves@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 8 months ago

sure. Eeevery single message worth 1€. don’t see any issues here…

view more: next ›

msgraves

joined 8 months ago