[-] niktemadur@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

That fucking doublespeak clickbait headline, straight out of goddamned Orwell.

[-] niktemadur@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

That stork is clearly trying to choke that wolf, from the inside!

[-] niktemadur@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Wouldn't you know it, I popped into the comments to say the exact same thing.

Now if we could get the other 28 (or however many it is) Helens to agree...

[-] niktemadur@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

ROTT PEROS!

[-] niktemadur@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I was just about to ask what about all those non-voting assholes, so many of them... a whole handful of lost generations in there, generations that could've, but wouldn't, bOtH pArTiEs ArE tHe SaMe LoL aMiRiTe or whatever.

"Gimme what I want in one election cycle... as if you had a magic political wand... as if it's easy to also simultaneously contend with a batshit crazy right-wing hellbent on obstruction and sabotage... or I'm gonna throw the whole thing down the toilet for myself and everyone around me and on down the line."

It may not be a coincidence that it also reads as:

"Vote for a woman? When pigs fly!"

What a mediocre batch of generations, throughout the decades. All mediocre seemingly in the exact boring same ways, in many respects. Y'all seem to be dead inside, out of boredom with yerselfs.

[-] niktemadur@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is what happens when you overthink the simple act of voting, when you navel gaze for days and months any simple physical effort that requires your presence with intent. You distort what it is and how it works.

A vote nudges things towards a direction, it is NOT a magic political wand that fixes things overnight. Inertia builds up only with several election cycles of consistency.

One side is cruel and will constantly sabotage good faith whether in or out of majority power. "Good faith is for suckers" is their goddamned motto, just one in a ton of toxic ideas and knee-jerk anger and greedy gluttony. Television and internet has amplified these virulent tendencies.

Whoever decided to not vote is in a muddy mental hole and has participated through inaction in making things much worse and perilous for millions of vulnerable living beings.

I have lost my faith in the younger generations, they cannot cut through the bullshit, are actively being bombarded in bad faith messaging, and it fucking worked.

Good luck in weeding out fascists and bigots from your society now. Especially in the judicial branch, you get to keep those for life. You have stabbed yourself in the chest with a rusty knife and call it "purity", you imbeciles.

[-] niktemadur@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

IDS (Imminent Death Syndrome) puts us all in an awkward position.

He could go at any moment... he's got entitilitus!

[-] niktemadur@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

An Honored Matre with her sexy skills!

[-] niktemadur@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

When he says "as famous as the Dodgers", does he mean Cookie Lavagetto-level famous, or Van Mungo-level famous?

[-] niktemadur@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

They should do a faithful-to-the-book adaptation of Moonraker!
Straight out of the mid-50s, an ICBM pointing at London and in a countdown. A race against time! (and Hugo Drax)

[-] niktemadur@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The opposite of a Bulwer-Lytton!

[-] niktemadur@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

5 year ban! How about at least 15 years? In case an outright lifetime ban is not permitted by law.

57
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by niktemadur@lemmy.world to c/askscience@lemmy.world

This all seems as exotic or esoteric to us now as these invisible electromagnetic waves were to Heinrich Hertz, who reportedly regarded them as mere scientific curiosities with no practical applications.

Unable to foresee radio, television, telephones, remote controls, microwave ovens, Wifi, Bluetooth... you get the point, that "thing with no practical applications" is now a staple of daily life, and all around us. We have fully tamed Electromagnetism.

Now with things like Quantum Computing and Bose-Einstein Condensates, we are starting to tame a new esoteric scientific curiosity - the probability wave function, the Uncertainty Principle.

Heinrich Hertz did not foresee things like satellite television and Spotify while looking for a spark flying across two metal tips from his dark room in the 1880s, but surely we have a better grasp of what potential benefits the newest technologies have in store for humanity?
Or are we for the most part still in the Hertz-like naive fiddling process?

Either way, there is going to be some incredible magic inside that quantum box!

103
12

For example, Humphrey Bogart as Indiana Jones in Raiders Of The Lost Ark. Or say Gregory Peck in Saving Private Ryan. Or how about James Dean as Luke Skywalker!

8
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by niktemadur@lemmy.world to c/askscience@lemmy.world

In the color lines of a spectrograph and what seems to be an area with a certain color, zooming in shows that this color is delicately split in half by a black vertical hairline, on one side it's the emission of photons of color by a hydrogen atom with a spin up electron, on the other it seems to be the same color but it's a spin down electron.

Whenever I hear that gap mentioned, 1/137 is invoked, but I'm not sure precisely what that means, and I'm visualizing that the color of the spectral emission can be divided or deconstructed into a total of 137 vertical lines, and the one in the middle is black.

Maybe it represents 1/137 of a photon's wavelength at a certain color?

38
59
89
82
34
51
-11
0

For example, places like HistoryPorn have some bizarre pictures of weird inventions or WWII experimental weapons.

How come I'm only just now coming across them? Why didn't we see them five or ten years ago, even in specialized forums and subreddits?

Places like ArtPorn or TraditionalArt are a trickier proposition. Here my lack of knowledge is vast, but I've really loved the history of painting for over two decades now, and have recently kept coming across a lot of 18th-to-20th century paintings and painters I've never heard of before; some of these are excellent, I should have known about them... I think. But like I say, there's more that I don't know than what I do.
If they are real and not recent AI creations, where are the original and who is digitizing and/or publishing so many of them all of a sudden in the past year?

view more: next ›

niktemadur

joined 1 year ago