[-] notsofunnycomment@mander.xyz 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No, I basically mean a sailing ship. A ship with sails. I'm curious about the possibilities to cross the Atlantic with no/low CO2 emissions. I have adjusted the title to make this clearer!

[-] notsofunnycomment@mander.xyz 10 points 5 months ago

There is a great story about that by the great writer Italo Calvino called 'the distance of the moon': https://irenebrination.typepad.com/files/calvino-italo-cosmicomics.pdf

[-] notsofunnycomment@mander.xyz 11 points 6 months ago

Scary shit.

[-] notsofunnycomment@mander.xyz 11 points 8 months ago

You should cover its nostrils.

[-] notsofunnycomment@mander.xyz 10 points 8 months ago

The part where they steal yes. The part where they keep what they steal to themselves, no.

[-] notsofunnycomment@mander.xyz 11 points 9 months ago

They wear “only Vans”.

[-] notsofunnycomment@mander.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

Asia is a bit bigger (and more climatically diverse) than Korea.

[-] notsofunnycomment@mander.xyz 10 points 1 year ago

I always thought it was moss, and that it was a sign I should go out more.

1

cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/933697

When it comes to spreading disinformation about climate change or the risks of smoking, I can clearly see how it protects economic interests (e.g. the value of the assets of the fossil fuel industry or the tobacco industry). I therefore understand that these lies are (have been) regularly pushed by people who do not necessarily believe in them.

But what are the strategic considerations behind the active spread of anti-vax theories? Who gains from this? Is it just an effective topic to rile up a political base? Because it hits people right in the feels? Is it just a way to bring people together on one topic, in order to use that political base for other purposes?

Or is anti-vax disinformation really only pushed by people who believe it?

0

When it comes to spreading disinformation about climate change or the risks of smoking, I can clearly see how it protects economic interests (e.g. the value of the assets of the fossil fuel industry or the tobacco industry). I therefore understand that these lies are (have been) regularly pushed by people who do not necessarily believe in them.

But what are the strategic considerations behind the active spread of anti-vax theories? Who gains from this? Is it just an effective topic to rile up a political base? Because it hits people right in the feels? Is it just a way to bring people together on one topic, in order to use that political base for other purposes?

Or is anti-vax disinformation really only pushed by people who believe it?

1

Does mander.xyz block sh.itjust.works? I don't see it in this list: https://mander.xyz/instances

view more: ‹ prev next ›

notsofunnycomment

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF