[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

this hasn't been a conversation for hours

[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

I thought if you had read it this might be a worthwhile conversation.

[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

I wanted to see if it was worth continuing this conversation

[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

I'm confident it is propaganda, but not having seen it, I don't know what politics it is pushing.

[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

not having seen it, I obviously can't tell you what is messages are.

[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

I have no interest though. do you have a point?

[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago

calling me names won't change the facts.

[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

only one of them* is peer-reviewed. it doesn't actually support the claim that you're using it to support. The others are of dubious validity, but they also don't make the same very strong claim that you have.

edit: "them" was in reference to the comment a few back in the thread. the gish gallop of links that appeared after i wrote this comment all appear to be peer reviewed.

[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago

turns out, everything is political, so, yes, it's all propaganda.

[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago

it's not useless if it describes something.

[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 days ago

The reason why PETA gets a lot of negative media attention is

there is more than one reason.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

nsrxn

joined 1 week ago