I thought if you had read it this might be a worthwhile conversation.
I wanted to see if it was worth continuing this conversation
I'm confident it is propaganda, but not having seen it, I don't know what politics it is pushing.
not having seen it, I obviously can't tell you what is messages are.
I have no interest though. do you have a point?
calling me names won't change the facts.
only one of them* is peer-reviewed. it doesn't actually support the claim that you're using it to support. The others are of dubious validity, but they also don't make the same very strong claim that you have.
edit: "them" was in reference to the comment a few back in the thread. the gish gallop of links that appeared after i wrote this comment all appear to be peer reviewed.
turns out, everything is political, so, yes, it's all propaganda.
it's not useless if it describes something.
The reason why PETA gets a lot of negative media attention is
there is more than one reason.
this hasn't been a conversation for hours