nsrxn

have fun

since I can't prove a negative, bring me a study and I'll show it either doesn't support your claim, or it has a limited scope, or flawed methodology.

I'm maintaining the same standard I have from the beginning.

your accusation of moving the goal post is unfounded.

i couldn't find your second comment. the link breaks on my side. the first one is from cowbee, who definitely didn't disappear and who is still quite active on this topic. the last one is from someone who disappeared BEFORE the election, so also does not fit yourcriteria

you are grasping at straws. instead of tilting at windmills, why don't you criticize trump, as you expect leftists not to criticize the democrats?

edit:

those comments were made after the election and things did change. they are not evidence those positions were held prior to the election. you're just wrong

which is far a field from where this discussion started, because someone is moving the goalposts.

your sarcasm doesn't prove the fictional people you are lambasting ever existed, either.

I can't speak for others. I was hoping their candidate would back off of supporting Israel and their sitting president would follow suit. it didn't happen so I don't know why you'd think I or anyone else would be pleased, or think it worked, or that that Democrats aren't responsible for their own failures

it's also met my theory, or anyone else's. it's a charicature made up by democrat party apologists. it's a strawman.

It is often modeled quite well with game theory.

no, it's not

they can't know what we will buy before they make it. they manufactur on speculation.

I don’t really feel like a protracted exchange where you move goalposts around

this accusation of bad faith is itself bad faith