The first articles overview says it looks at 11 mass shootings and the 2nd link mentions that the data is from the narrowest subset of mass shootings. Without a strict definition you can have the numbers point to what you want.
outdated2139
joined 2 years ago
I wouldn't say that everyone wants their own benevolent dictator, but the ones who have that view can only picture theirs in power. I'm sure Hitler had a bunch of people who liked what he was doing.
It's their authoritarian dictator so they'll love it.
In high profile mass shootings. I don't know if there is data on it but I'd assume most mass shootings are committed with handguns.
So you would want a near ban on all guns? Just curious what you mean by gun control everywhere.
One thing that I'm sure will come out of this story is the gun is stolen. Washington has safe storage laws, but if you report your gun stolen, you are not liable for any crimes committed with it. It happened when a man shot a mother and child in Seattle and the original owner was okay because he reported it stolen. The government should be prosecuting these negligent gun owners.
Either way, you're not ready to talk about it.
So it is too soon to talk about gun reform laws since you obviously don't want to. Got it.
She could completely blow it by picking the wrong running mate. For instance if she picked Hillary, it would be over. That isn't going to happen though and she has good options for a running mate if they choose to accept.
People are high on her now because it's refreshing news they won't have to vote for Biden. We'll see if the momentum can carry over into the election and if Kamala shoves her foot in her mouth. I don't think she will inspire a lot of people to vote but Trump will inspire a lot of people to vote against him.