owl

joined 2 months ago
[–] owl@infosec.pub 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Welcome to Mar-A-Lago, I love you.

[–] owl@infosec.pub 2 points 1 week ago

Didn't even notice how old it is, it's still fresh ;)

[–] owl@infosec.pub 1 points 2 weeks ago

"You both like sex" :D

[–] owl@infosec.pub 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You are not allowed to wear blue or pink.

[–] owl@infosec.pub 2 points 2 weeks ago

Genuinely wonder what the game would be like on an infinite board.

[–] owl@infosec.pub 1 points 2 weeks ago

I saw a pink frog. Better stop drinking tap water.

[–] owl@infosec.pub 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What's so bad about being a lurker?

[–] owl@infosec.pub 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

First time we all understand these women idolizing someone like this.

[–] owl@infosec.pub 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Are you the originator? I feel kinda honoured.
So they are to be consumed independently? But some do belong together? There are repeating characters, but can they be assorted into a story?
You probably draw more joy from causing these questions than answering them, but I still would like to ask. ☺

[–] owl@infosec.pub 2 points 3 weeks ago

In this construct the key is the thing, that signifies the owner. If it's lost, there is no help. Unless the key is tied to you and an authority can vouch for you.

[–] owl@infosec.pub 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Well they would sign my public key plus ID of the song. I can prove, it is my public key and everyone can verify the song belongs to me.

You are right, to ensure noone can "share login" so to say, it needs to be tied to you personally. That would deny privacy sadly.

EDIT: Didn't notice I wrote the wrong thing, thanks for notifying me.

[–] owl@infosec.pub 2 points 3 weeks ago

I don't think so. There nothing non fungible in my idea and nfts require a blockchain.

view more: ‹ prev next ›