[-] peto@lemm.ee 17 points 2 weeks ago

The "This one neat trick big water won't tell you about" to "the government can't tell me not to dig my well next to my latrine" pipeline (aquaduct?) is real.

[-] peto@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago

When you realize both that your family is trying to kill you for the inheritance, but you might just let them.

[-] peto@lemm.ee 17 points 2 months ago

But if I don't have American politics to distract me I have to confront how generally fucked the UK is.

[-] peto@lemm.ee 17 points 6 months ago

What are they doing in Texas? Just handfuls of bullets served in a cowboy hat?

[-] peto@lemm.ee 15 points 7 months ago

More importantly, where did he go?

[-] peto@lemm.ee 16 points 9 months ago

We don't, fundamentally. All we can do is construct models and see if they match our observations. How do we know the world exists beyond our sensation of it? That could be an illusion too.

The base assumption that we work on is that the universe is the same here as it is there. Same rules, same interactions. We work out what we should be able to see and then go looking for it, so far that has worked.

As an example, we can look at some hydrogen in a lab and see what kinds of light it absorbs, we can then look at the sun and see if it is absorbing the same light, we can then look at another star and see that it two is absorbing the same light. So we can be confident that the hydrogen in our lab is like the hydrogen in the sun, and that the distant star is made of the same stuff as our sun. We can do wlthis with each element. We can look at the motion of planets around the sun, and we can look at the motion of stars around the center of the galaxy and see that they follow the same patterns.

It's like trying to work out what is going on in the next room by listening, you can get a good idea, but it could be an empty room with a radio.

[-] peto@lemm.ee 17 points 10 months ago

Oh, that kind of bad usb cable. Still useful I guess.

[-] peto@lemm.ee 16 points 11 months ago

On top of that you need to account for the fact that the earth's surface is moving at different speeds depending on latitude and elevation. Even if you can do the calculations to hit your mark, there is most likely to be some energy mismatch that needs to be accounted for.

[-] peto@lemm.ee 16 points 11 months ago

Finland.

Or New Zealand if you are a cartographer.

[-] peto@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

The problem is that money is permited to generate money. So the more you have beyond the threshold to sustain yourself the more you can generate without labour. The business with no interest loans accelerates things but it isn't the problem. It is that the system rewards idle investors at the expense of those whose labour actually generates value.

Capitalism wasn't fine until someone broke it. The core concepts behind it are flawed.

[-] peto@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

This has been disproved. We live on a globe in an experimental non-magical universe kept at a university run by wizards who live on a disc held up by four elephants on the book of the Great Atuin.

[-] peto@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

Cops might be tasty too. You don't know until you try.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

peto

joined 1 year ago