Well, Robbo got injured in an international friendly…better not be seriois

Unfortunately there can still be emissions:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1193-4

From abstract:

A recently reported slowdown in the decline of the atmospheric concentration of CFC-11 after 2012, however, suggests that global emissions have increased3,4. A concurrent increase in CFC-11 emissions from eastern Asia contributes to the global emission increase, but the location and magnitude of this regional source are unknown3. Here, using high-frequency atmospheric observations from Gosan, South Korea, and Hateruma, Japan, together with global monitoring data and atmospheric chemical transport model simulations, we investigate regional CFC-11 emissions from eastern Asia. We show that emissions from eastern mainland China are 7.0 ± 3.0 (±1 standard deviation) gigagrams per year higher in 2014–2017 than in 2008–2012, and that the increase in emissions arises primarily around the northeastern provinces of Shandong and Hebei.

I assume the benefit would be a better performance, anything else? Simple tab group is pretty feature packed, I’d think FF own would take some time to reach that level.

I’d add the calcium from the water as a factors

Brain can put its spin on perception, especially when tired or agitated, like, when anticipating something out of worry/fear (which can be somewhat subconscious).

But yeah having talk with a doctor is not a bad idea.

My point is how much he lied about himself, misled his own voters, I don’t see how he would’ve been less corrupt given a bit time. I’m pretty sure it generally holds that a new comer is less corrupt than when he/she is an old timer.

This guy, given his proven baseline morals, would’ve become one of the worst in terms of corruption.

We’ll see if they’ll try to target Gomez with Son. IIRC Gomez had a pretty solid game agaist West Ham, so hopefully he’ll build on that.

Ihan rapeet hinnat kyllä!

Lieron lisäksi oli myös MoleZ, jostain syystä jälkimmäistä tuli pelattua enemmän.

Exactly why it doesn't matter, it's not an incendiary weapon meant to target ppl in the incendiary way, thus it's not seen as bad of a thing as an incendiary weapon. To put it in other way: that person didn't feel the horrible (and longer) incendiary effect because of the other effects of the weapon. Does it really matter if the person is outside or inside of an armoured vehicle? The actual incendiary weapons are whole different thing.

Mikä tässä muuten on se tavoite: Lapset aikaisemmin oppimaan vai aikuiset nopeammin takaisin töihin?