[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

Once a detector is good, you can train a model to adjust its outputs to cause false negatives from the detector. Then the cycle repeats. It's a cat and mouse game basically.

The only proper way I see is a system that is based ob cryptographic signatures. This ia easier said than done ofc.

[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

Not sure of you're trolling or not...

[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

I agree. Especially as the app is already 20 MB in size... 1.5MB wouldn't make much difference IMO.

105
Ich👅iel (lemmy.world)
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by rainerloeten@lemmy.world to c/ich_iel@feddit.de

Laminierter DIN A4 Zettel am Pfandautomaten eines Rewe Markts, auf dem steht: "Sehr geehrte Kundinnen und Kunden, AUS HYGIENISCHEN GRÜNDEN BITTEN WIR SIE DEM PFANDBON NICHT IN DEN MUND ZU NEHMEN. Wir danken für Ihr Verständnis."

[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I think this is more a case of the triangle inequality in metric spaces, as you don't have to calculate any particular edge to see the shortcut, as well as that it applies to any even non-rectangular triangle.

[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

It was so crowded actually, that most people didn't even realize the protest was canceled.

Also the cell network (both internet and SMS/calls) was completely down, so meeting up or getting information was nearly impossible

[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This shouldn't be "offered" IMHO, this should be mandatory. Yes, people are very ignorant about cyber security (I've studied in this field, trust me, I know). But the answer isn't to put the responsibility on the user! It is to design products and services which are secure by design.

If someone is actually able to crack accounts via brute-forcing common passwords, you did not design a secure service/product.

[Edit: spelling]

[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I think he was being sarcastic, playing with words. Meaning, that you trade in time, runtime and memory and get nothing in return :D so a pretty bad trade haha.

Of course it's worse, I mean, that was the point of this blogpost, wasn't it? :p It's just a (long) joke.

[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 55 points 9 months ago

Someone should make a post about why blocking Threads is good and why it's not to be confused with gate keeping. If not properly communicated, this could look very badly for the uninitiated and they're not to blame.

Some people of course have an educated opinion against blocking, but many presumably don't know the reasons behind it.

[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

You sound very passionate but also very aggressive. It's almost uncomfortable to read 😅 Will check it out though, thank you.

[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

Are those actual conservatives or ones which would be called extreme right-wingers or fascists in non-american politics?

[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 40 points 11 months ago

Yeah just fucking sad. This guy changed the way I think about software, releasing code I write, contributing etc. Would be so sad to see him go.

[-] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

I just wanna add that one reason this monopoly is dangerous is that Google (could and nowadays) does use it to dictate "web standards". So e.g. they don't come anymore from organizations that develop standards but Google just forces their own standards by sheer power of market dominance.

view more: next ›

rainerloeten

joined 1 year ago