this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
907 points (98.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

26390 readers
1501 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 290 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Tangentially related rant: We had a new contributor open up a pull request today and I gave their changes an initial look to make sure no malicious code is included.
I couldn't see anything wrong with it. The PR was certainly a bit short, but the task they tackled was pretty much a matter of either it works or it doesn't. And I figured, if they open a PR, they'll have a working solution.

...well, I tell the CI/CD runner to get going and it immediately runs into a compile error. Not an exotic compile error, the person who submitted the PR had never even tried to compile it.

Then it dawned on me. They had included a link to a GitHub Copilot workspace, supposedly just for context.
In reality, they had asked the dumbass LLM to do the change described in the ticket and figured, it would produce a working PR right off the bat. No need to even check it, just let the maintainer do the validation.

In an attempt to give them constructive feedback, I tried to figure out, if this GitHub Copilot workspace thingamabob had a Compile-button that they just forgot to click, so I actually watched Microsoft's ad video for it.
And sure enough, I saw right then and there, who really was at fault for this abomination of a PR.

The ad showed exactly that. Just chat a bit with the LLM and then directly create a PR. Which, yes, there is a theoretical chance of this possibly making sense, like when rewording the documentation. But for any actual code changes? Fuck no.

So, most sincerely: Fuck you, Microsoft.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 53 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Surely you have to blame the idiot human here who actually has the ability to reason (in theory)

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 57 points 10 months ago (5 children)

You think the decision to build this bot like that was not made by a human? Its idiot humans all the way down.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kissaki@programming.dev 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Commit with Co-authored-by: Copilot

or maybe better --author=Copilot

It would certainly help evaluate submissions to have that context

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 160 points 10 months ago (14 children)

We will never solve the Scunthorpe Problem.

[–] GeorgimusPrime@lemmy.world 48 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SatouKazuma@programming.dev 26 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Hasn't it been proven unsolvable?

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 54 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Impossible. There is always some mf named like cum-sock, smh

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 35 points 10 months ago

some mf named like cum-sock

Excuse me? My family BUILT this country!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] oce@jlai.lu 135 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I had a Pycharm linter with "inconsiderate writing list" flag my use of "bi" as inappropriate, recommending to use "bisexual" instead. In my data job, BI, means business intelligence, it's everywhere.

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 136 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Gotta love Microsoft Power Bisexual

[–] watersnipje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I now identify as a Power Bisexual.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] communism@lemmy.ml 49 points 10 months ago (2 children)

How is that inconsiderate? That's just informal

(Using "bi" to mean "bisexual", I mean, not "business intelligence" lol)

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 65 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, it's right.

Business intelligence is inconsiderate and must be stopped!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 10 months ago

I'm confused how bi is inappropriate

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zikeji@programming.dev 87 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Holy shit, 10,000 commits because each change was individual (I'm assuming automated).

https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js/pull/29798

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 72 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Those commit messages though 🤣

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 50 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They automated randomization of the commit messages? Wtf?

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago

Gotta appreciate the level of commitment on this commit...

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 66 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

oh god

yeah, no. haha

[–] maniel@sopuli.xyz 34 points 10 months ago
[–] lily33@lemm.ee 34 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

And they're all with different commit message:

"switched arse to bottom to create a more uplifting vibe"

"took arse out and put bottom in to keep my language warm and friendly"

"thought bottom would sound a lot nicer than arse, so I used it"

And so on..

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 16 points 10 months ago

wtf it was real?

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 57 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 51 points 10 months ago

It’s a clbuttic mistake.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 43 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I've been tempted to create a bot that does nothing but search comments in code for misspelled words and create pull requests for them.

If it stays in comments, little chance in breaking a working codebase and I'd have an insane amount of commits and contributions to a wide variety of codebases for my resume.

I'll never be a top tier coder. But I might make management.

[–] Keenuts@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago (2 children)

In case that wasn’t satire, please don’t 🥲 A small typo in a comment is not a big issue, and even if the PR is straightforward, a maintainer still has to take some time reviewing it, which takes time away from fixing actual bugs 😢

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

But think of the gains!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NumerousGeorg@sopuli.xyz 33 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I am in doubt. That wouldn't even compile. But who am I to think somebody changing something like this would actually do a test compilation afterwards....

[–] dan@upvote.au 45 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

HTML isn't compiled, and unknown attributes are allowed. The best practice is to prefix non-standard attributes with data- (e.g. <div data-foo="test">) but nothing enforces that. Custom attributes can be retrieved in JavaScript or targeted in CSS rules.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 30 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's time for chbottomt and clbottom to finally become valid HTML statements.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Or just have some random subset of browsers support them for some reason and other browsers not so much. It’s the html way.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 10 months ago

clbottomt when the chtopt shows up [imagine this as that popular GIF meme]

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago (2 children)

What is a 'charset' in this depraved persons mind? A corset? Must be a mighty kinky corset.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 81 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It's replacing all instances of arse and ass with bottom...but doing so in about the most naïve way possible.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] omgitsaheadcrab@sh.itjust.works 29 points 10 months ago

It's got an arse in there

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago

Fucking Scunthorpes!

[–] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

OMG this took me way too long to get. They replace the substring "ass" 😭😭

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Ok, how is "charset" vulgar?

Edit: got it; arse

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 20 points 10 months ago

Luckily the feck attribute is too obscure to be in the line of fire.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The ol' master/ slave configuration again....

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›