..how did the line come about? How did they determine what the life expectancy would have been with less expenditure per capita?

Ah right, and here I thought the point of the protest was calling for peace. Silly me!

I recently tried to find out whatever happened to it, couldn't find anything beyond the announcement that it would happen.

As a native German speaker I agree that ChatGPT is very English-flavored. I think it's just because the sheer amount of English training data is so much larger that the patterns it learned from that bleed over into other languages. Traditional machine translations are also often pretty obvious in German, but they are more fundamentally wrong in a way that ChatGPT isn't.

It's also somewhat cultural. The output you get from ChatGPT often sounds overly verbose and downright ass-kissing in German, even though I know I wouldn't get that impression from the same output in English, simply because the way you communicate in professional environments is vastly different. (There is no German equivalent to "I hope this email finds you well", for example.)

I am in pure disbelief at how aggressively the country is prosecuting dissent on this particular conflict compared to previous crises. Literal neo-Nazi marches are scrutinized less than activists calling for peace. Germany has just gone full mask off

Grammarly has a terrible privacy policy, so you are right to be cautious. Unfortunately I don't have any good alternatives to offer as I only use spellcheck myself.

The community is called "No Stupid Questions", maybe you could adjust the tone of your answer accordingly.

Huh..? Salzburg is pretty small and so is its airport. What route would you have to take that you end up in a small, barely international airport and not realize at your last transfer that you were in the wrong part of the world?

anyone who likes logical consistency

That's the neat part, they don't.

Alle machen sich hier lustig weil es so offensichtlich sei, aber auch das Nachweisen von "offensichtlichen" Tatsachen ist ein wertvoller Teil der Wissenschaft. Jetzt hat man eine ganz konkrete Zahl, die man denen entgegnen kann, die meinen "das bringt doch eh nichts" (o.Ä). Vorher hätte man nur mit wenig aussagekräftige Anekdoten oder Vermutungen kontern können.

Currently, as much as 40% of food is thrown away in the US, while millions of people experience food insecurity. The scarcity is fully intentional.

Ok..? Why is this news?