[-] smrtfasizmu@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

What are you implying here? I barely had any posts because I don't come on here very often and when I do, I mostly lurk. I merely wanted people's opinions and I posted on the appropriate instance. What's the problem?

[-] smrtfasizmu@lemmygrad.ml 24 points 10 months ago

I'm not criticising Palestinians for their religiosity. I'm criticising Hakim for his idealist assertions in the community post.

[-] smrtfasizmu@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 10 months ago

Sorry, I don't use Hexbear. Could you please give me a link to the post?

[-] smrtfasizmu@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

But isn't religion a source of false consolation? The real consolation would of course be the improvement of material conditions.

It certainly helps people cope with day to day life under capitalism, but eventually it needs to go.

42

The idea that the Palestinian people have only been able to persist because of their religion is ridiculous to me. They are resisting because colonialism, apartheid and genocide are very bad things to which nobody would want to be subjected, not because of Islam. If Palestinians were atheists, is he suggesting that they wouldn't have the strength or the will to resist? Would their lack of a belief in the supernatural turn them into doormats for Isn'treal?

I like Hakim's content, but his position on religion is quite frustrating. He is a Muslim first and a Marxist second. Also, Joram van Klaveren is still a right-winger.

13
[-] smrtfasizmu@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago

You made it seem like she died

[-] smrtfasizmu@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Apparently Kollontai didn't develop the Glass of Water theory. I don't know how true that is, since I've never even heard of Kollontai until I read your post, but this article is an interesting read nonetheless: https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/atc/1724.html

[-] smrtfasizmu@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago

Here are the 12 commandments:

  1. Sexual life shall not develop too early among the proletariat.

  2. Thou shalt exercise sexual restraint until marriage, and marriage shall take place only upon full social and biological maturity (20-25 years).

  3. Sexual relations shall be the culmination of a deep and comprehensive sympathy and attachment to the object of thy sexual love.

  4. The sexual act shall be the final link in a chain of deep and complex experiences binding the lovers together at that moment.

  5. The sexual act shall not be repeated often.

  6. Thou shalt not often change thy sexual object. There shall be less sexual variation.

  7. Love shall be monogamous and monoandrous (one wife, one husband).

  8. Every sexual act must be committed without forgetting the possibility of conceiving a child – thou shalt always remember thy progeny.

  9. Sexual selection shall always be conducted along the lines of revolutionary-proletarian class objectives. Elements of flirtation, skirt-chasing, coquetry, and other particular methods of sexual conquest must not be introduced into love relations.

  10. Thou shalt not be jealous.

  11. Thou shalt not engage in sexual perversions.

  12. In the interest of revolutionary expedience, class shall have the right to interfere in the sexual life of its co-members; the sexual shall always be subordinate to class interests, never interfering with the latter, but shall always serve it.

[-] smrtfasizmu@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sorry for being that guy, but it should be "el comunismo"

smrtfasizmu

joined 2 years ago