surreptitiouswalk

joined 2 years ago
[–] surreptitiouswalk@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If it's known that cars are less manoeuvrable and have poorer sight lines, why do motorcyclists insist on gunning it past cars and swerving into the next lane before they've fully cleared the car they're trying to overtake. Not to mention the constant overtaking from the left, which is a completely moronic thing to do. If they're weaving in and out of traffic rather than just staying in their lane and spot, they're far less likely to sneak up on a car unawares and get hit.

That is entirely on them.

[–] surreptitiouswalk@aussie.zone 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Surely they have more incentive to drive safe coz the price of having an accident is so much higher for them (physical injury, maiming and death).

[–] surreptitiouswalk@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Honestly any business that uses an ISP email address just looks amateurish to me.

[–] surreptitiouswalk@aussie.zone 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There's a reason insurance companies don't cover flood plains, because it's a matter of when, not if, and insurance won't cover losses that will definitely happen.

Surely what it demonstrates is once you have foreign citizenship, don’t go back to China? That’s not good for the Chinese economy.

I don't even think it's necessary to go that far. This should be "don't work in a political position in/for China".

[–] surreptitiouswalk@aussie.zone 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

Let me put it another way, where do you think her loyalties lie before her arrest? China or Australia? If you don't think that matters, I'd urge you to examine what citizenship means.

[–] surreptitiouswalk@aussie.zone 4 points 2 years ago (7 children)

I'm not claiming any moral high ground, I'm merely staying that she worked for a Chinese media organisation and that essentially makes her part of China's political apparatus. That makes her at risk of being a political prisoner.

Also as Raltoid said, she's spent 37/47 years of her life in China. Coupled with her career choice, her government is the Chinese Government, not the Australian government despite what her papers say.

Extra speed of build is a pretty good draw card even if it is 30% more expensive, and just diversifying the range of materials available for building high rises is always good for the industry. It'll be interesting to see where it ends up!

My guess is they came to an agreement that their product offering is different enough that they can trade under the same name?

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/feb/27/fast-food-chain-wendys-plans-roll-out-in-australia-but-potential-naming-clash-looms

[–] surreptitiouswalk@aussie.zone 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (18 children)

This might be harsh but I have little sympathy for this woman. Remember she was the news anchor at CGTN from 2012 - 2020 and based on Beijing at that time. CGTN is a state owned news (i.e. propaganda) outlet. She was an Australian Citizen prior to taking that position, so surely she should be aware of what she was walking into a conflict between Australian values of freedom and the oppression that the CGTN apparatus represents.

Instead of being an ethical and fearless journalist, she picked money, clout and prestige, betraying the very principles of the country that she's pleading for sympathy from now.

The fact that the role become a poisoned chalice is entirely predictable. It's disappointing that our government is now having to expend political capital for her.

I'm not sure what point you're making, but someone sitting on 10 properties with a total networth of $20M cannot spent any of that until they sell the property. That's $20M is on paper wealth. That $20M only becomes real wealth when they sell up, at which point it attracts CGT.

[–] surreptitiouswalk@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

In that case, if the renovation wasn't deducted off primary income by negative gearing, it would be deducted off the CGT tax when the property is sold as it could count as a capital expense.

https://www.ato.gov.au/Individuals/Capital-gains-tax/Property-and-capital-gains-tax/CGT-when-selling-your-rental-property/#Capitalexpenses

view more: ‹ prev next ›