That's why scihub is so popular
One of the few companies I've purchased digital good from - and they haven't enshittified themselves yet
Ich hatte nicht gedacht, dass ich Mal den Tag miterlebe, wo Wettermoderator*en angegriffen werden. Ich meine.... die berichten ja einfach das Wetter. Das WETTER. DAS unkritischte Thema überhaupt... würde man meinen....
Bei so einem Alarm kann ich das ignorieren der Stummschaltung aber auch verstehen. Ciele haben automatische Stummschaltung während Arbeitszeiten - aber ein Alarm ist halt wichtiger...
Leider trifft das vor allem auf viele Gesetze zu die in letzter Zeit Verschlüsselung angreifen und Kinder schützen sollen ...
Irgendwie finde ich dieses neue Format mit der Gans und dessen typischen Einschüchterungsgeste sehr unterhaltsam
edit: typos
protect children online
I've yet to see any single new law proposal, that actually tackles this problem rather than misusing it's emotional trigger to get acceptance for surveillance and control
Noise-Cancelling In-ear Kopfhörer. Als jemand mit etwas Hochsensibilität (bin leicht zu überstimulieren via Sound uns Licht etc.) merkte ich erst mich solchen Kopfhörern, wie laut es echt in Städten ist und wie beruhigter ich nun endlich gehen kann. Ziemlich schade und nervig, dass Laute Autos so normalisiert und "unvermeidbar" sind.
Dazu noch: Persönliches Wissensmanagement mit Obsidian.md (https://obsidian.md). Seitdem ich das habe, habe ich nicht mehr das Gefühl Information zu verlieren (die ich längerfristig brauche) und habe auch keine Angst, dass irgendeinw Firma einen Lock in macht (Evernote, Reddit etc...)
Oh, I have two good ones:
-
Nuclear power causes less deaths (per energy unit produced) than wind (source)
-
You get less radiation when living near a nuclear power plant, than if that nuclear plant hadn't been there.
To explain the second: A major misconception is, that nuclear power plants are dangerous due to their radiation. No they aren't. The effect of radiation from the rocks in the ground and the surroundings is on average 50x more than what you get from the nuclear power plant and it's fuel cells. (source). Our body is very well capable of dealing with the constant background radiation all the time (e.g. DNA repairs). Near a power plant, the massive amounts of isolation and concrete will inhibit any background radiation coming from rocks from that direction to you. This means, that you'll actually get slightly less radiation, because the nuclear plant is there.
Regarding the dangers of nuclear disasters. To this day, it's been very hard to find out, if at all any people have even died to Fukushima radiation (ans not other sources such as tsunami/earthquake/etc.) Nuclear radiation causes much more problems by being an emotionally triggering viral meme spreading between people and hindering it's productive use and by distracting from the ironic fact, that the coal burned in coal power plants spew much more radiation into the atmosphere than nuclear power plants themselves. (source)
The EU AI Act would require the company to disclose details of its training methods and data sources.
If we're not going to make this apply to AI companies, which have overporportionate power already, then what else is there to talk about?
Living near a nuclear plant.
Little do they know, that they get more than 50x more radiation effect from the natural surroundings and the rocks in earth than from the nuclear plant 🤭 And our body is really capable of dealing with that since the beginning of our evolution (DNA repairs and co).
https://pages.vassar.edu/ltt/files/2011/04/Screen-shot-2011-04-21-at-1.18.09-AM1.png
here is a chart showing radiation intensities for various sources of radiation
AfD alleine regierend halte ich für sehr unwahrscheinlich. Aber wenn dann CxU/AfD.
Ich werde ernsthaft über emigrieren nachdenken und überlegen wohin und wie. An demos teilnehmen sowieso.