I have personal experience with these "churches" after my time in Portland. They were far and away worse than the homeless. They will harass and abuse you on the street ESPECIALLY if you dare express cynicism towards their spiel.

They will follow you, and verbally abuse you unless you bee-line straight for a police station too.

Why these charlatans are able to masquerade as a religion I'll never know....

yeah…

They asked for easy, or newbie friendly - and didn't particularly mention privacy concerns.

Other than that, if they don't have a port 80/433 ingress from their ISP there are scarce simple solutions that don't require another server that also needs management, either by them or a corporate entity.

back when i was on a DOCSIS modem, i noticed concurrent downloads would disrupt uploads and vice versa. i think this may depend on the type of connection OP has.

I used to work at a cable company, that was either a problem that people with low SNR had. Either from external factors (tree branch on a cable line) or in-home ones (bad splitter). A modem will ramp up it's gain in order to offset this (to a point), and in so doing, create a lot more interference between channels. OR they were hitting their ingress rate limit (which is quite agressive on residential plans because DDOS'es). It's surprisingly easy to hit your ingress rate limit for modern http/https webservers hosting complex web apps. Lots of concurrent connections open up to try to download all the resources when you go to any website in a modern browser and while it's not a TON of data, the short period of time causes the traffic to easily hit the PPS/BPS rate limit that ISPs employ.

But yeah, it all depends on the ISP.

I'm really skeptical that this would work. Rural folks have been brainwashed to view college education with extreme cynicism. Their children can only do so much to reverse that.

Source: Grew up in a Rural News Desert

Beat me to it!

Here's the pre-order page (includes a soundcloud version of the song as well) - https://www.metalblade.com/keygenchurch/

Praise the Code!

Nope - full fat install on hardware - as I said in the post.

Again, just so you don't miss the crucially important context - I'm an advanced user. I typically run vanilla arch or endeavor, both of which do not have these issues. Not to mention, I know that many of these are a result of adding so many repositories on top of the base Arch ones - at least as upgrades are concerned.

If this was in a VM I would go to great lengths to specify as such.

I think Chakra has largely been abandoned these days, but when it was the newest kid on the block I actually appreciated the REALLY GOOD QT5 experience that was lacking on other distros at the time. That being said, not being able to install ANY GTK thing was definitely a deal-breaker. These days the project is very dead and the best "KDE" experience is on KDE Neon.

"Your application" - the customers you mean. Our DB definitely does it's own rate limiting and it emits rate limit warnings and errors as well. I didn't say we advertised infinite IOPs that would be silly. We are totally aware of the scaling factors there and to date IOPs based scaling is rarely a Sev1 because of it. (Oh no p99 breached 8ms. Time to talk to Mr customer about scaling up soon)

The problem is that the resulting cluster is so performant that you could load in 100x the amount of data and not notice until the disk fills up. And since these are NVME drives on cloud infrastructure, they are $$$.

So usually what happens is that the customer fills up the disk arrays so fast that we can't scale the volumes/cluster fast enough to avoid stop-writes let alone get feedback from the customer in time. And now that's like the primary reason to get paged these days.

We generally catch gradual disk space increases from normal customer app usage. Those give us hours to respond and our alerts are well tuned. It's the "Mr. Customer launched a new app and didn't tell us, and now they've filled up the disks in 1 hour flat." that I'm complaining about.

I'm rolling with a Halfling Rogue, it's always the class I try to play first in D&D games and versions. I'm also surprised at the lack of Halflings in the stats!

My wife is playing a Githyanki the only race that's less popular. Lol!

Eh, it doesn't feel like a value assessment as much as my brain pulls an inception and I'll "Get up" only to realize I've just started simulating my day in another layer of lucid dreams. Sometimes I'll eventually get up and be kinda frustrated that I have to do all the work "twice", lol.

I'm the instance admin of Tucson.social and I support this message.

You see, Lemmy is steeped in what I like to call "Tech bro culture" - maybe not the original devs, but definitely the community that espouses these "tips". These folks, despite their education, often fail to understand how non-technical people think, or even just how less technical (but completely competent) folks think.

Let me tell you what it requires to host an instance:

• Intermediate Linux Skills
• Basic to Intermediate Docker Skills
• Intermediate to Advanced Networking skills
• Intermediate to Advanced Information Security Skills
• LOTs of Time, especially when no one else wants to moderate or administrate.

And that's just the TIP of the iceberg. Sure you can run a completely private instance that negates the need for heavy moderation, but you still need to protect that instance and make sure it works from a wide range of devices and networks.

So yeah, we see many instances that were created that are now dead or dying because the instance admins didn't know they needed DDOS protection, or CAPTCHA, or any number of security tools, and now they are at the whim of bad actors or simply couldn't keep up with the poorly documented changes that have now broken their instance.

Then, once you get past that issue, and you have a popular instance, then Regulatory Compliance becomes an issue. This is intrinsically linked to the ability to moderate the content. Sure, there are ways to automatically report illegal content, but in say, a NSFW community that's a never ending battle that could could end up with a subpoena or 10.

So yeah, I recommend anyone who isn't a seasoned Infrastructure / DevOps / InfoSec / Full Stack Engineer stay away from creating their own instances for now because those that do end up creating "Bot Bastions" that make the fediverse worse, not better.

I dunno Mr. Google, but I'm fairly sure Azure won't decide to sell of their domain registrar out from underneath their customers.

I'm fairly certain that Azure won't drastically update the "packages" to buy ever 6 months like GCP/Gcloud did.

I'm fairly certain, that given the track record of Google products and services, that this has nothing to do with Azure being "anti-competitive" and everything with Google being known for axing their own products. If I build something on GCP, I can't trust that it will continue to run unattended. I know I'll need to always keep my eyes on the news feed should Google axe another product I was using.

In lemmy's case, my perusal of the DB didn't really suggest that the queries would be that complex and I suspect that moving it to a higher performance NoSQL DB might be possible, but I'd have to take a look at a few more queries to be sure.

I wonder if this could be made to work with Aerospike Community Edition...

Obviously it could be more effort than it's worth though.