Never going to happen. They’ve been going the total opposite direction for a long time
I’m not seeing how this in anyway even really touches on this issue at hand. A paper on human development to show that “science says” we have a “human” at the moment of conception?
At the end of the day this is going to just be about what your definition of a “human” is rather than anything “science” has to say.
On the science side it's a human from the moment of conception.
Citation needed
This basically underpins the whole thing and is pretty hand waved away
I mean, didn’t we pretty much already know the theory of gravity was incomplete? Hence dark matter / dark energy.
Edit: ok I see the article is much about the competing theories. I guess that’s why I shouldn’t react to headlines…
YouTube is the cable tv of 2023
It’s so weird how we look back on those things that were seen as inconveniences, driving to a physical store / rental time limits, as good things now.
It’ll be interesting to see if we find ways to kinda bridge those gaps.
What if you could go and a rent physical DVDs
This year I’m gonna Google wtf that means
I don’t think that really follows. Would you say molecules of fluid have a collective consciousness?
We might be picking up on things we don’t consciously notice that guide our movement but it’s still a local thing that doesn’t require a collective consciousness
Well research teams have been working on it 10 years
Another possible innovation would be people onboard to row