His son looks prophetic. He knew. He knew.
wuphysics87
What about using lynx or eww?
Unmaterialist?
Fountain
I just take it as "I'm sorry I hurt your feelings"
You'll have to run that back for me. Are you saying the political aparatus is so powerful it can do whatever it wants with equal effectiveness of method? Or the public across the board being so stupid it doesn't make a difference whether something is real or not? Or something else?
Isn't this more credible than some qanon shit? After all, we are talking about it too
Not if it's rubbing someone's face in it
Newsom is a piece of shit, but that quote is out of context. The 'work' wasn't literal. It was 'working to use your platform to reach across thé ailes' or some kind of horse shit. If he absolutey had to say something, offer condolences to the family and shut the fuck up. The whole make sure you please everyone is going to leave everyone pissed about something
I wouldn't say don't, but be careful if you want to keep your job. I suggest making it inferred and not direct. Example. The day after the election I showed Carl Sagan's Pale Blue Dot. The one with the footage of the plane hitting the World Trade Center. It was VERY on the nose and a few students complained in my evals, but I got away with it because we were starting Universal Gravitation and I showed The Drake Equation first. It was very much a "while we are talking about Carl Sagan...". There was enough context and plausible deniability you'd have a hard time going after me. And I'm glad I did. A lot of students needed to hear it. Here are the two videos so you can see what I'm talking about:
Presumptive I'm not thinking critically ☹️. My point is that there is no such thing as identical to an arbitrary level of accuracy. Were I to presume what you mean, you are say