I don't want any more competitive shooters with no dedicated server published. See this if institutional memory doesn't go that far, Dice fuckers: https://www.eurogamer.net/battlefield-keeping-dedicated-servers
it's fit for work if it can shit and stare
That's nice, daijobu desu ne
Xbox Boss Phil Spencer
Get rid of that fucker first
in the absence of alternatives, there are enormous economic incentives for advertisers to try to bypass these countermeasures, leading to a perpetual arms race that we may not win
Fuck off with that defeatist shit Mozilla, don't decide for us.
Firefox with ublock and a normal engine
Newpipe for downloading stuff off YT
OSMand for offline navigation
f-droid for foss software
Rethink to carefully ban everything that doesn't need internet from connecting
a phone with a nice amoled screen and all-day quickcharging battery that costs 180€ (motorola g52)
not one ad anywhere
a better question is, why would I want anything else? An iphone seems like a sharp downgrade.
Pot protecting users from kettle
definitely reduces my loyalty to the platform
You are either paying the subscription or not, your inner states mean nothing to them or us.
Many older and/or casual gamers who've stopped following gaming and are living under the idiomatic rock would absolutely love a steam deck. And a significant portion of those would find it an upgrade over their laptop for Office and shit.
That's great news, I'm really digging the slow downfall.
I am noticing your post, but I file it as part of the "anecdotal generalizations" trend
Note "published". Yes they use dedicated servers, but I'm not paying for ubishit or ea games that don't offer them for players to self-host.