56
submitted 3 months ago by CAVOK@lemmy.world to c/europe@feddit.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] recursive_recursion@programming.dev 19 points 3 months ago

Irish law prohibits searching for archaeological objects with a metal detector without written permission from the government

??????? WHY? this is the most ridiculous thing I have read so far.

I'm curious as to how and why this became a law in Ireland, maybe there's a justifiable reason for this but without further context this is baffling to say the least

[-] muelltonne@feddit.org 22 points 3 months ago

It totally does make sense. Amateurs with metal detectors are in most cases not really qualified to to archeological digs. And they really are not able do document them properly. Archeology is not only about the artifacts, but also about how they were found. Take a roman coin: If you buy it on Ebay or find it in the street, it is a roman coin. But if you find a roman coin f.e. on an ancient battlefield, you can use it to date the battle. That context gets lost when archeology is not done properly.

Also their finds are vanishing mostly into private collections. That really doesn't matter with random coins, but f.e. the sky disc of Nebra, one of Europes most stunning bronze age finds, was dug up during an illegal private metal detector search and they then tried to sell it on the black market. So it does make sense to ban metal detector hunting.

[-] Peter_Arbeitslos@feddit.org 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

was dug up during an illegal private metal detector search

People just still do it, but don't report anything. I don't think the average illegal „hunter" is interested in finding a treasure and illegally selling it on black market, making his potential punishment even worse. In Germany it's on the federal state to create the legal basis for a lot of things which you probably know, muelltonne, metal detecting is one of these. This makes the legal situation even more complicated with some states completely prohibiting and some allowing it if the land owner agrees. The Nederlands on the other hand have the same legal situation in the whole country, as far as I know, where searching for archaeological objects is legal with very few bureaucratic restrictions and a nation-wide app for registrating seekers and uploading their findings to the authorities. They're happy with that.

[-] muelltonne@feddit.org 2 points 3 months ago

And then there is the whole issue with private property - even if you're not allowed to use metal detectors, there is nothing preventing you from digging holes in your own garden. But that is not what most people are doing - most suburbs are getting an archeological survey before they are build and then the construction will destroy everything else. So most metal detectors are running around on fields, through woods, some with private owners, some in state ownership

[-] eRac 21 points 3 months ago

It may be an anti-looting measure. If you are caught artifact-hunting without a permit, it's assumed you were doing it for profit.

that makes sense

hopefully Ireland's government puts out a statement or something to declare that this is an exception seeing that both the farmer and discoverer sent the artifacts in good faith

[-] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I don't know about Ireland, but in Germany 'treasure hunting' with a metal detector is prohibited as well. Artifacts residing in the ground are property of the state, unlike in e.g. England where afaIk they belong to the land owner. Additionally, 'treasure hunting' destroys the archaeological find situation, as the metal artifacts are digged out usually no proper documentation is done while destroying the placement an organic surrounding artifacts.

[-] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 5 points 3 months ago

Most likely to discourage people from doing that.

Now why would they want to discourage it? So people are not A) digging artifacts out of the ground, because their surrounding area is as important as the artifact itself. The reason being, it possibly tells you something about the time period and circumstance of why it is there in the first place. And B) so private people are not just selling treasures that belong to all. To quote the one guy who might be the worst archaeologist: "it belongs in a museum"

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

My thought is that the law is a remnant of Ireland's occupation, but that's a total guess.

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Don't think they had laws about artefact hunting with the use of metal detectors 100-300 years ago. This law is from 2014 lol.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The patent for metal detectors was submitted in 1881. The occupation ended in 1922.

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Patent does not mean existing or widespread. Apple had a patent for airbags in their phones and have for the past 15 years. I've still yet to see them materialise.

Regardless, Ireland's law is from 2014. Blaming Britain is just brain-dead. Believe it or not, things happen in Ireland that are completely unrelated to the UK's past.

E: the first metal detector patent was in 1925.

[-] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 months ago

Besides the other reasons listed, it may also be dangerous. Don't know about Ireland, but here in Germany there's a lot of unexploded bombs from WWII underground that might go off if manipulated.

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
56 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

1559 readers
271 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS