1557
Unbelievable (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 55 points 3 months ago
[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 months ago

Manslaughter. But yeah, fuck this guy.

[-] BlackDragon@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 months ago

Murder. You're not going 75mph in a 25mph zone and trying not to kill people. Doesn't matter whether there was a specific target in mind.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 2 points 3 months ago

If you do it in a car it's all good. Evidently if you get killed by a speeding hunk of metal, it's really important to differentiate between the different sizes.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Murder requires malice (i.e. intent), and you don't meet the standard of intent just by exceeding some level of recklessness/negligence.

[-] BlackDragon@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago

Driving 75mph in a 25mph zone is malicious and indicates intent to kill people.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

No, that's not how intent works. What it shows is recklessness.

[-] BlackDragon@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 months ago

Maybe that's not how it works by your definition of intent, but it certainly is how it works in mine.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago
[-] BlackDragon@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 months ago

Right, and I'm not a prosecutor so I don't give a fuck about specific legal definitions.

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
1557 points (99.1% liked)

People Twitter

5268 readers
745 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS