1372
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Five@slrpnk.net to c/lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone

To clarify, the pictured poster Caroline Kwan is an ally, not a TERF. The TERFs referred to in the title are the ones ‘protecting a very specific idea of what a woman is’

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] eleitl@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago

It's a reasonable catchall, could have said baseline. Or define things by exclusion, which is unnecessarily technical and verbose.

[-] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It sure is a catchall. However, you don't need to be technical or verbose. The scientific term you want is phenotypical.

I still wonder how you don't think you're being intersexist at the moment though? Like, where do you draw the line? Is a woman with PCOS disallowed because it causes a slightly elevated testosterone level? What about a woman with webbed feet? They wouldn't be considered phenotypical either.

But why don't we get a little more technical and verbose for a second. The typical female testosterone range is 0.5-2.4 nmol/L (that's nanomoles per litre). The typical male range? 10-35 nmol/L. A woman with PCOS may have levels around 2.5-3.5 nmol/L. Someone with Caster Semanya's (alleged, never confirmed) condition would typically have around 3.5-5 nm/L. Still half or less than a phenotypical male. So I bring it back to the webbed feet, because they'd probably be similarly on par in terms of the advantage they provide.

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
1372 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

2719 readers
207 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS