195
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] superkret@feddit.org 18 points 4 months ago

Microsoft published, using their software and servers, a libelous claim, to potentially millions of people.
The details of how the software was programmed should be legally irrelevant.

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 12 points 4 months ago

* a GDPR violation, in Germany

[-] Shitgenstein1@awful.systems 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The details of how the software was programmed should be legally irrelevant.

Why? Programmers should be legally liable for what they program.

[-] Architeuthis@awful.systems 5 points 4 months ago

Why? Programmers should be legally liable for what they program.

Too many degrees of separation between a programmer and the final product and how it's used, usually.

Additionally, the decision to deploy an incomplete product or one that contains known flaws is an administrative decision, not a programming one.

this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
195 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1494 readers
49 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS