119
submitted 1 week ago by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 week ago

The same argument can be used in favor of Russia. NATO has invaded plenty of countries under false pretenses in the past. Both Russia and NATO do not have a reputation for keeping their promises.

[-] Miaou@jlai.lu 2 points 1 week ago
[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Unironically yes, NATO members have invaded a lot of places, often in coalition with other member states.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago

That's like saying Canada is responsible for something Mexico did because they're both on the same continent...

NATO is purely a defense agreement.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It is more like saying the axis is known to invade nations because its member states invade nations. Okay, sure, Germany and Italy invaded the soviet union but Japan didn't, you can't say they're not a defensive alliance /s

this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
119 points (96.9% liked)

World News

32082 readers
1275 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS