649
submitted 1 month ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 23 points 1 month ago

problem is you could never prove beyond all reasonable doubt he didn't believe it himself

[-] MimicJar@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago

That's because he really does believe it. If you listen to him say he heard it on TV it is the most genuine statement he has ever made. It's like a child telling you exactly what they saw on TV.

If you're looking for someone to sue it would have to be the "sources" Trump heard the information from. Unfortunately I'm confident those people understand the ruse. They know to say allegedly. They know how to utilize weasel words.

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Oh man. "I saw it on TV!". Exact same intonation my 4yo used when he saw a "trailer" for Mario Movie 2 when actually it was just some junk a highschool kid threw together in iMovie. Totally belief and innocent ignorance.

It's at that moment I realized that Trump isn't just a useful idiot. He's the perfect useful idiot.

Like a part of me thinks that Trump might actually believe in Santa and that he looks an awful lot like that guy in the power tool show and sounds an awful lot like Buzz Lightyear.

[-] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

He's the Star Trek Mirror Universe version of Chauncy Gardener.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago

The "sources" is Vance the previous day in a rally.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Of course. He saw Vance say it on TV so it must be true.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 month ago

problem is you could never prove beyond all reasonable doubt he didn't believe it himself

Sounds like a candidate for a proper psych evaluation, then.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

His niece, Mary Trump, knows him well and is a licensed clinical psychologist. She’s spoken and written extensively on his mental disorders (normally a psychologist won’t do that publicly, but she’s said he’s such a danger to the nation, she feels she has no choice).

She’s well worth reading and listening to.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

And she's not the only person in his family tree that is speaking out against the orange menace.

[-] paf0@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

He has the best brain. The greatest brain. One time, for some unknown reason, he took a cognitive test meant for dementia patients. He supposedly passed but he claimed it was hard for him. Such a stable genius.

[-] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 month ago

Person.
Woman.
Man.
Camera.
TV.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

The amazing thing about that idiocy mostly flew under the radar at the time:

According to neurologists, in the test he was bragging about (aside from being extremely easy because it’s meant to screen for dementia), those would not have been the words.

The point of the 5 words portion is that the words are never related, because that would defeat the purpose of the memory test. They’re always carefully selected unrelated words, like daisy clock giraffe piano door.

He very obviously did not remember the words and was just naming things he could literally see at the time.

[-] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 month ago

He very obviously did not remember the words and was just naming things he could literally see at the time.

Exactly.

[-] colmear@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

aNOthEr aTtAcK oN oUR rIGHtful LEaDer bY thE wOkE mOb

[-] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

In legal speak the term is "knew or should have known"

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 1 month ago

is that actually the bar for slander? interesting

[-] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's just the phrasing that lawyers always use because it's difficult to prove that someone actually knew something. So even if the person denies they knew it wasn't one hundred percent true you can still make the argument that they should have known it wasn't true. Although, you cant always be sued for defamation about a group of people. It depends on the laws in that state

this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
649 points (99.2% liked)

News

23259 readers
3388 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS