414

‘Morally indefensible’ – but George W Bush will not come out against Trump (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 month ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

117 comments fedilink hide all child comments

While Dick Cheney has endorsed Harris, there have been no comments from other senior Republicans from Bush’s era

The MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell this week hit out at George W Bush, the Republican former president, for refusing to weigh in on America’s looming presidential election.

“All any decent person wants him to do is to say, ‘Don’t vote for Donald Trump, and here’s why,’ and he won’t even do that,” O’Donnell told the Fast Politics podcast, of the Republican president who was in office from 2001 to 2009.

Increasingly, Bush – and some other top Republicans from his political era – are looking lonely in their ongoing refusal to take a side in an election in which many have warned that US democracy is under threat from Trump’s open sympathies with autocracy.

🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 140 points 1 month ago

big fucking tough guy when it comes to sending other peoples' kids out to die for a bullshit war based on outright lies

but when it's time to actually take the correct stance on something, he buckles like a lawn chair under the average cod cosplaying maga chud

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 44 points 1 month ago

I was living in NYC before and after 9/11.

The Ground Zero pit stayed undeveloped until 2007 because that's how long it took the money men to decide which insurer would pay for what. George W. never bothered to push them to hurry things, because it was vital that every single penny be accounted for. No problem with starting a war with lies, but money must be guarded to the utmost.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 22 points 1 month ago

They wanted it to stay an open wound because it let them be more jingo

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

"Jingoistic" is a phrase I've not heard in a long time.

[-] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 34 points 1 month ago

He's super busy painting dog pictures.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm pretty sure his endorsement would be a negative. Same with the Cheney one, I can't think of anyone that would look at that and be like: yes, I'll go with Cheney. If anything it would turn people off.

[-] ochi_chernye@startrek.website 3 points 1 month ago

I think you're right, but I'd like to believe there was at least one person out there that thought, "Shit, I'd better vote for Harris, or he might shoot me in the face!"

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

cod cosplaying maga chud

Had to recalibrate my mental image from the fish costume I imagined before remembering that Call of Duty exists 😄

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024

414 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19089 readers

3863 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News