216

Long-forbidden French anti-riot force sent to Martinique as thousands defy bans on protests (apnews.com)

submitted 1 month ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

France has sent a group of special anti-riot police that’s been banned for 65 years to the French Caribbean island of Martinique, where protesters have gathered despite the government barring demonstrations in parts of the island.

The force arrived this weekend after the local representative of France’s central government in its overseas territory, said in a statement that protests were forbidden in the municipalities of Fort-de-France, Le Lamentin, Ducos and Le Robert until Monday. The government also issued a curfew.

The restrictions came after violent protests broke out on the island last week over the high cost of living, with gunfire injuring at least six police officers and one civilian. Police launched tear gas and government officials said several stores were also looted.

The elite riot police, known as the Companies for Republican Security, were banned in the French territory following bloody riots in December 1959. The unit had been accused of using disproportionate force against protesters, ending in the deaths of a number of young demonstrators. The force is rarely deployed in French territories in the Caribbean, but was called on during riots and strikes in Guadeloupe in 2009.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

And living on the island sucks it sounds like, probably because of France.

HDI of 0.848, top spot in the Caribbean. Taking Latin America as comparison, Chile and Argentinia edge it out by a smidgen and those are large countries with resources and economies of scale (Martinique is like 350k people).

GDP/capita is 40,587 (USD PPP), not that dissimilar to France's poorer European regions (Corsica: 43,564, Hauts-de-France: 45,961). It's the richest overseas department.

They had a referendum for more autonomy (not even independence, just cease to be a department and become an overseas collective instead) in 2010, the 'no's had it with 80% at a 55% turnout. What do you expect Paris to do, kick them to the curb?

This might, you know, just be French people being French and protesting a lot and violently. If this would happen anywhere else in France people would call it business as usual. Because, you know, French folks elsewhere have been protesting a lot and violently about standards of living. Practically every Banlieue in mainland France should be quite a bit worse off regarding that though that kind of reasoning is erm problématique.

[-] PoopDelivery@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

People are protesting because the cost of living is so high, they don't give a fuck about HDI or GDP.

The 2010 referrendem was proposed because of high cost of living and rich white people controlling everything. Plus, were they gonna get support going forward or were they expected to become independent on their own after like 500 years of being colonized?

I'm guessing rich white people are still in control, and the protestors are mostly black. Doubt they'd send their controversial anti riot police to beat on an island full of white French people.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Plus, were they gonna get support going forward or were they expected to become independent on their own after like 500 years of being colonized?

The referendum wasn't about independence, but becoming an overseas collective. Increased autonomy. More legislative power to the region itself. I'm not that firm on French constitutional law but it probably would have been useful if you planned on doing land reform, or expropriate. Not necessary when it comes to EU cohesion funds, the EU is very keen on having people decide locally, anyway, because of the Brits. Speaking of the EU and cohesion funds, have a brief.

I’m guessing rich white people are still in control, and the protestors are mostly black.

Few people still own lots of land, the state is still in control and still democratic, and the protestors are mostly workers. Of note: Agriculture doesn't dominate the economy, that is, that land ownership comes with limited economic power. I don't think land reform would really make a systemic difference stuff like education is more important, not that I would be opposed though. Do I read "why not make money with medical tourism from the US" between the lines in that EU brief. I

...anyhow. Note the absence of "white" and "black": This is France, even if melanin is distributed in certain ways noone wants to talk about anything in race terms (unless it's literal individual racism) because All French Are Equal and All French Are French, and no when France wins a football game it's not Africa that wins. That's shit racists say. You may not like it, but that's how the French want to roll.

I wonder what happened to good ole class analysis in the Anglosphere. Too leftist?

Doubt they’d send their controversial anti riot police to beat on an island full of white French people.

That'd be Corsica. Yes, yes they definitely would. They probably did in 2022 it just didn't make the news. Corsicans, at least, had the sense of actually accepting an offer for more autonomy. The language issue still isn't solved, though, I think, and apparently hell will freeze over before the French will ratify the ECRML.

this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024

216 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38969 readers

2638 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.