688
Average systemd debate (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by renzev@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
121 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 7 hours ago

the default is smart

Looking at the systems that are supported, it makes the greatest sense to have the safest failure mode as default. If fault tolerance is available, that can be handled in the entry but, it makes sense but to assume. Having that capability built into the default adds more complexity and reduces support for systems that are not tolerant of a missing mount.

[-] wormer@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 hours ago

Sorry if it looked otherwise, I was agreeing to BCsven. I agree with you

this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
688 points (95.6% liked)

linuxmemes

20705 readers
1074 users here now

I use Arch btw

Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
poopsmith@lemmy.world
zephyr@lemmy.world