I think two can be fine, if just to cover weird situations you might find yourself in (cosigning with somebody, somebody dies and leaves it you, or I guess I don't really mind a "summer home"). I think beyond that though I agree.

I think it should be third home illegal

Private landlords are not as bad. If everyone had only one house there'd be nowhere to rent unless you only want to rent the room.

Now corporate landlords. They own so much real estate it's practically a monopoly. And as a business they're profit driven and exploit their tenants. I think renting wasn't so bad before companies started investing in real estate.

I would rather go with it is illegal to leave a home unoccupied unless you stay there for more than X days an year, say 100.

Having the surplus wealth to justify a second home while there are so many people without homes or living in poverty is the real issue here.

Oh, I like this one.

I think having multiple houses(for different seasons or whatever) is fine. It is the financial exploitation of housing that is wrong. You shouldnt be able to rent houses.

Sometimes you don't get them on purpose.

Disagree, so you're correct in that it's an unpopular opinion.

Because simply building a house costs hundreds of thousands, people starting out in life can't go straight to home ownership.

So does the government provide all rental property? If yes, all good, just wondering what your thinking is.

Why?

Unpopular AND ridiculous. Well done!